Great Lakes mallard population dynamics

Abstract Breeding mallard ( Anas platyrhynchos ) populations in the Great Lakes region (Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, USA) declined by >40% between 2000–2022 based on abundance data collected during spring aerial surveys. Mallards are an important waterfowl species in this region, where an estimated 60–80% of the mallard harvest is composed of locally banded birds. Extensive population monitoring datasets are available for mallards, presenting an opportunity to address complex questions such as estimating productivity at large spatial and temporal scales, identifying the effects of harvest on mallard demography, quantifying mechanisms for harvest compensation, and integrating multiple datasets to quantify the demographic drivers of population change. Our objective was to simultaneously examine factors affecting demographic parameters and their relative contribution to Great Lakes mallard population dynamics. We used 32 years of banding, band recovery, and aerial survey data collected for mallards from Michigan and Wisconsin to develop an integrated population model (IPM). We used age ratios at banding to estimate productivity, band recoveries from hunter‐harvested birds to estimate annual survival and cause‐specific mortality (i.e., harvest or non‐hunting), and modeled abundance using aerial survey and demographic parameter estimates from 1991–2022. The IPM results indicated the decline in Great Lakes mallard abundance was caused by increased non‐hunting mortality and a decline in productivity. Productivity varied spatially but temporally declined with the loss of Conservation Reserve Program area. Moreover, our productivity assessment provided evidence of density dependence in reproduction. Non‐hunting mortality was 3.5–6.7 times and 1.3–4.2 times greater than harvest mortality for adult and juvenile female mallards, respectively, indicating environmental factors during spring and summer, not harvest, most greatly influenced annual mortality for female mallards. Our IPM reduced uncertainty in the factors affecting Great Lakes mallard population dynamics and indicated management actions that address non‐hunting mortality and productivity would be most effective in increasing Great Lakes mallard abundance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wildlife Management
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22702
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Great Lakes mallard population dynamics

Amy A. Shipley, Brendan T. Shirkey, Gerald R. Urquhart, Jason M. Winiarski et al.
1 citations
Journal of Wildlife Management
Avian ecology and behavior
0.46
article

Great Lakes mallard population dynamics

Amy A. Shipley, Brendan T. Shirkey, Gerald R. Urquhart, Jason M. Winiarski, Philip Lavretsky, Drew N. Fowler, John Simpson, John M. Coluccy, Benjamin J. O’Neal, Daniel B. Hayes, Gregory J. Soulliere, Benjamin Z. Luukkonen, Scott R. Winterstein, Barbara A. Avers
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Breeding mallard ( Anas platyrhynchos ) populations in the Great Lakes region (Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, USA) declined by >40% between 2000–2022 based on abundance data collected during spring aerial surveys. Mallards are an important waterfowl species in this region, where an estimated 60–80% of the mallard harvest is composed of locally banded birds. Extensive population monitoring datasets are available for mallards, presenting an opportunity to address complex questions such as estimating productivity at large spatial and temporal scales, identifying the effects of harvest on mallard demography, quantifying mechanisms for harvest compensation, and integrating multiple datasets to quantify the demographic drivers of population change. Our objective was to simultaneously examine factors affecting demographic parameters and their relative contribution to Great Lakes mallard population dynamics. We used 32 years of banding, band recovery, and aerial survey data collected for mallards from Michigan and Wisconsin to develop an integrated population model (IPM). We used age ratios at banding to estimate productivity, band recoveries from hunter‐harvested birds to estimate annual survival and cause‐specific mortality (i.e., harvest or non‐hunting), and modeled abundance using aerial survey and demographic parameter estimates from 1991–2022. The IPM results indicated the decline in Great Lakes mallard abundance was caused by increased non‐hunting mortality and a decline in productivity. Productivity varied spatially but temporally declined with the loss of Conservation Reserve Program area. Moreover, our productivity assessment provided evidence of density dependence in reproduction. Non‐hunting mortality was 3.5–6.7 times and 1.3–4.2 times greater than harvest mortality for adult and juvenile female mallards, respectively, indicating environmental factors during spring and summer, not harvest, most greatly influenced annual mortality for female mallards. Our IPM reduced uncertainty in the factors affecting Great Lakes mallard population dynamics and indicated management actions that address non‐hunting mortality and productivity would be most effective in increasing Great Lakes mallard abundance.

Journal of Wildlife ManagementVol. 89(2)
United States Geological Survey (US), Michigan Department of Natural Resources (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), The University of Texas at El Paso (US), Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (US), Ducks Unlimited (US), Michigan State University (US), Franklin College (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Michigan State University, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations, AgBioResearch, Michigan State University, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Avian ecology and behavior
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.