International rural new energy industry innovation development and benefit-linkage practices

The rural new energy industry is a crucial area for promoting green transformation and achieving sustainable development, significantly contributing to improvements in energy structure and environmental protection. While China’s rural new energy industry has made substantial progress due to policy support and technological advancements, it still faces numerous challenges in practical development. This paper aims to compare and analyze the experiences and practices of various countries and regions—including the United States, the European Union, Brazil, and China—to identify their primary benefit-linkage mechanisms, policy support systems, and overall performance. Based on this analysis, the paper will provide policy recommendations and improvement measures for the innovative development of China’s rural new energy industry. The research findings indicate that (1) different countries and regions employ various benefit-linkage mechanisms in the rural new energy sector, including cooperative models, public-private partnerships, and community participation models. Each mechanism has its unique advantages and disadvantages in facilitating project development and benefit linkage. (2) Although all countries have established comprehensive policy support systems, there are notable differences in the introduction and implementation of market mechanisms. The European Union and the United States possess relatively mature market mechanisms for carbon emission trading and green certificate trading, whereas the market mechanisms in China and Brazil are either new or not sufficiently developed. (3) The United States and the European Union demonstrate strong performance in technological advancement and market operations, yielding significant economic and environmental benefits. In contrast, China and Brazil have made progress in policy support and technology adoption but need to enhance their market mechanisms and international cooperation. (4) Social participation and community support yield important social benefits in new energy projects across various countries and regions, particularly the community participation model, which positively impacts community cohesion and project development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Economies
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62617/se280
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International rural new energy industry innovation development and benefit-linkage practices

Shi Yin
Sustainable Economies
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

International rural new energy industry innovation development and benefit-linkage practices

Shi Yin
article en

Abstract

The rural new energy industry is a crucial area for promoting green transformation and achieving sustainable development, significantly contributing to improvements in energy structure and environmental protection. While China’s rural new energy industry has made substantial progress due to policy support and technological advancements, it still faces numerous challenges in practical development. This paper aims to compare and analyze the experiences and practices of various countries and regions—including the United States, the European Union, Brazil, and China—to identify their primary benefit-linkage mechanisms, policy support systems, and overall performance. Based on this analysis, the paper will provide policy recommendations and improvement measures for the innovative development of China’s rural new energy industry. The research findings indicate that (1) different countries and regions employ various benefit-linkage mechanisms in the rural new energy sector, including cooperative models, public-private partnerships, and community participation models. Each mechanism has its unique advantages and disadvantages in facilitating project development and benefit linkage. (2) Although all countries have established comprehensive policy support systems, there are notable differences in the introduction and implementation of market mechanisms. The European Union and the United States possess relatively mature market mechanisms for carbon emission trading and green certificate trading, whereas the market mechanisms in China and Brazil are either new or not sufficiently developed. (3) The United States and the European Union demonstrate strong performance in technological advancement and market operations, yielding significant economic and environmental benefits. In contrast, China and Brazil have made progress in policy support and technology adoption but need to enhance their market mechanisms and international cooperation. (4) Social participation and community support yield important social benefits in new energy projects across various countries and regions, particularly the community participation model, which positively impacts community cohesion and project development.

Sustainable EconomiesVol. 2(4)
Hebei Agricultural University (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.