Hemodynamic evaluation of a novel double lumen cannula for left ventricle assist device system

BackgroundThe left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been proven to be an effective therapy for providing temporary circulatory support. However, the use of this device can cause myocardial injury due to multiple insertions of various catheters.ObjectiveTherefore, this study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of a newly developed double-lumen catheter (DLC) for LVAD.MethodsTwo different LVAD DLC prototypes (a semi-circular and a concentric catheter) were designed based on the structure of venous DLC. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed using the finite element method. The CFD results were confirmed through the testing of the 31 Fr prototype. The aorta is a large vessel with shear rates up to >300 s<sup>-1</sup> and we used a reasonable approximation to model blood as a Newtonian fluid.ResultsAt a flow rate of 5 L/min, the semi-circular prototype achieved an infusion pressure of 74.68 mmHg, while the concentric prototype achieved an infusion pressure of 46.11 mmHg. The CFD results matched the experimental results with a mean percentage error of less than 7%. The peak wall shear stress in the semi-circular prototype (717.5 Pa) was higher than the hemolysis threshold (400 Pa), which could cause blood damage, and it also had a higher hemolysis index compared to concentric prototype. Moreover, both prototypes exhibited areas of blood stagnation and recirculation, suggesting a possible risk of thrombosis.ConclusionBoth prototypes of the LVAD DLC demonstrated similar blood flow rates. The semi-circular prototype showed superior infusion pressure compared to the concentric prototype, but had poorer hemolysis performance. However, the potential risk of thrombosis for both still exists. Therefore, further <i>in vivo</i> experiments are necessary to verify the safety and effectiveness of the LVAD DLC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology and Health Care
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329241290947
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hemodynamic evaluation of a novel double lumen cannula for left ventricle assist device system

Qilian Xie, Peng Hu, Yao Xie, Xuefeng Feng et al.
Technology and Health Care
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Hemodynamic evaluation of a novel double lumen cannula for left ventricle assist device system

Qilian Xie, Peng Hu, Yao Xie, Xuefeng Feng, Honglong Yu
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been proven to be an effective therapy for providing temporary circulatory support. However, the use of this device can cause myocardial injury due to multiple insertions of various catheters.ObjectiveTherefore, this study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of a newly developed double-lumen catheter (DLC) for LVAD.MethodsTwo different LVAD DLC prototypes (a semi-circular and a concentric catheter) were designed based on the structure of venous DLC. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed using the finite element method. The CFD results were confirmed through the testing of the 31 Fr prototype. The aorta is a large vessel with shear rates up to >300 s<sup>-1</sup> and we used a reasonable approximation to model blood as a Newtonian fluid.ResultsAt a flow rate of 5 L/min, the semi-circular prototype achieved an infusion pressure of 74.68 mmHg, while the concentric prototype achieved an infusion pressure of 46.11 mmHg. The CFD results matched the experimental results with a mean percentage error of less than 7%. The peak wall shear stress in the semi-circular prototype (717.5 Pa) was higher than the hemolysis threshold (400 Pa), which could cause blood damage, and it also had a higher hemolysis index compared to concentric prototype. Moreover, both prototypes exhibited areas of blood stagnation and recirculation, suggesting a possible risk of thrombosis.ConclusionBoth prototypes of the LVAD DLC demonstrated similar blood flow rates. The semi-circular prototype showed superior infusion pressure compared to the concentric prototype, but had poorer hemolysis performance. However, the potential risk of thrombosis for both still exists. Therefore, further <i>in vivo</i> experiments are necessary to verify the safety and effectiveness of the LVAD DLC.

Technology and Health CareVol. 33(2)
Hefei University of Technology (CN), Anhui Transport Consulting & Design Institute (China) (CN), Tongling University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.