Commentary: Without Values, Complexity is Reduced to Mathematics

This commentary on Sturmberg and Mercuri's paper 'Every Problem is Embedded in a Greater Whole' [1] argues that those authors have approached complexity from a largely mathematical perspective, drawing on the work of Sumpter. Whilst such an approach allows us to challenge the simple linear causality assumed in randomised controlled trials, it is itself limited. Mathematical complexity can explain nonlinearity and network effects but it cannot explain human values. It overlooks, for example, how science itself is historically and culturally shaped and how values-driven misunderstandings and conflicts are inevitable when people with different world views come together to try to solve a problem. This paper argues that the mathematical version of complexity thinking is necessary but not sufficient in medical research, and that we need to enhance such thinking further with attention to human values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14263
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Commentary: Without Values, Complexity is Reduced to Mathematics

Trisha Greenhalgh
3 citations
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Mental Health and Psychiatry
12.65
article

Commentary: Without Values, Complexity is Reduced to Mathematics

Trisha Greenhalgh
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This commentary on Sturmberg and Mercuri's paper 'Every Problem is Embedded in a Greater Whole' [1] argues that those authors have approached complexity from a largely mathematical perspective, drawing on the work of Sumpter. Whilst such an approach allows us to challenge the simple linear causality assumed in randomised controlled trials, it is itself limited. Mathematical complexity can explain nonlinearity and network effects but it cannot explain human values. It overlooks, for example, how science itself is historically and culturally shaped and how values-driven misunderstandings and conflicts are inevitable when people with different world views come together to try to solve a problem. This paper argues that the mathematical version of complexity thinking is necessary but not sufficient in medical research, and that we need to enhance such thinking further with attention to human values.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical PracticeVol. 31(1)
University of Oxford (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Mental Health and Psychiatry
12.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.