A Ticking Time Bomb: Restrictions on Abortion Rights and Physical Integrity Rights Abuses

Do abortion restrictions augur broader crackdowns on human rights? We examine the relationship between restrictions on abortion and future Physical Integrity Rights (PIR) abuses. We argue that abortion restrictions both directly and indirectly influence PIR. Directly, abortion restrictions serve as a testing ground for repressive policies and behaviors. Indirectly, restrictions worsen inequality across segments of society and winnow support for social and religious diversity. When abortion restrictions are enacted, regimes are better equipped to shift society and consolidate power, as a subdued public is discouraged from voicing collective grievances. Using a variety of time-series cross-sectional approaches, we show that significant retractions in abortion access foretell erosion of PIR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Political Science Review
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055424000960
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Ticking Time Bomb: Restrictions on Abortion Rights and Physical Integrity Rights Abuses

Victor Asal, Amanda Murdie, Nazlı Avdan
1 citations
American Political Science Review
Gender Politics and Representation
0.93
article

A Ticking Time Bomb: Restrictions on Abortion Rights and Physical Integrity Rights Abuses

Victor Asal, Amanda Murdie, Nazlı Avdan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Do abortion restrictions augur broader crackdowns on human rights? We examine the relationship between restrictions on abortion and future Physical Integrity Rights (PIR) abuses. We argue that abortion restrictions both directly and indirectly influence PIR. Directly, abortion restrictions serve as a testing ground for repressive policies and behaviors. Indirectly, restrictions worsen inequality across segments of society and winnow support for social and religious diversity. When abortion restrictions are enacted, regimes are better equipped to shift society and consolidate power, as a subdued public is discouraged from voicing collective grievances. Using a variety of time-series cross-sectional approaches, we show that significant retractions in abortion access foretell erosion of PIR.

American Political Science ReviewVol. 119(4)
University of Kansas (US), University of Georgia (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Gender Politics and Representation
0.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Ticking Time Bomb: Restrictions on Abortion Rights and Physical Integrity Rights Abuses — Victor Asal, Amanda Murdie, et al. · American Political Science Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS