Closure of Constraints as a Theoretical Model

Abstract In this paper I offer a model-theoretic interpretation of Autonomy Theory as defended by Moreno, Mossio, Montévil, and Bich. I address accusations that Autonomy Theory is excessively liberal, such as those made by Garson (2017), arguing that these misunderstand the role of strategic abstractions and generalizations in theory construction. Conceiving of closure of constraints as a model-building effort that emphasizes generality—in the spirit of Levins (1966)—also clarifies its potential for application in empirical contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2024.63
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Closure of Constraints as a Theoretical Model

Campbell Rider
2 citations
Philosophy of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
12.08
article

Closure of Constraints as a Theoretical Model

Campbell Rider
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper I offer a model-theoretic interpretation of Autonomy Theory as defended by Moreno, Mossio, Montévil, and Bich. I address accusations that Autonomy Theory is excessively liberal, such as those made by Garson (2017), arguing that these misunderstand the role of strategic abstractions and generalizations in theory construction. Conceiving of closure of constraints as a model-building effort that emphasizes generality—in the spirit of Levins (1966)—also clarifies its potential for application in empirical contexts.

Philosophy of ScienceVol. 92(3)
The University of Sydney (AU)
University of Sydney
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy and History of Science
12.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.