The Intersection of Identity and Economic Geography: LGBT+ Economic Rights and Economic Development in China
This study investigates the social impact of economic geography by focusing on the LGBT+ population in China. Specifically, it examines the extent to which LGBT+ persons in China enjoy the right to economic development, considering the countrys overall conservative cultural landscapeparticularly in rural areasand the dual urban-rural system that spatially distributes economic activities in the country. The paper explores the relationship between economic growth and acceptance levels for LGBT+ ideologies across Chinas urban and rural areas. It identifies demographic factors that potentially impact the economic status of LGBT+ persons in the country. The paper employed a qualitative research method comprising extensive desk research and interviews with four participants: 2 from urban areas and 2 from rural regions. Interviews were conducted both in-person and via phone calls, and data on participants religious and ideological beliefs regarding same-sex relationships were collected. Findings from both the literature review and interviews demonstrate significant differences in the way urban and rural areas in China view the LGBT+ identity. Results show that urban centres, particularly large cities such as Beijing and Shanghai, are more accommodating to and accepting of LGBT+ persons than are rural areas and, in turn, offer greater employment prospects and entrepreneurial opportunities to LGBT+ individuals. The paper concludes by emphasising the need for policies that acknowledge LGBT+ persons right to self-expression in China and those that support their integration into the countrys broader economic landscape.
Authors
- Jinyue Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2979-1734)
Institutions
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
- Published
- 2024-12-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.ga18160
- Primary Topic
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00