The epistemic judgement framework: a reflexive tool for physical education teachers’ professional development to support Quality Physical Education

The need for Quality Physical Education to provide the many benefits the subject offers is well established. Unfortunately, in too many areas ineffective teaching and learning practices are limiting the profession’s response to children’s developmental needs. Many teachers’ professional development interventions are criticised as not enabling the required philosophical, and pedagogical shifts that are needed to improve practice and student outcomes. The paper presents a new integrated model, the Epistemic Judgement Framework to enhance this process. Epistemology offers an important lens by which to explore teacher beliefs and behaviors, however, existing research in this field is very specific in scope, which makes learning transfer difficult. To better explore this area a fuller appreciation of the bioecological environment in which teaching takes place as well as the Critical Realist view of the teaching world is introduced. The purpose of this article therefore is to propose a framework to guide teacher professional development to support the achievement of Quality Physical Education that merges environmental considerations and exploration of hidden influencers with epistemological research on teacher decision making and behavior. Practical applications for teacher professional learning utilizing the model and future directions are suggested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1480690
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The epistemic judgement framework: a reflexive tool for physical education teachers’ professional development to support Quality Physical Education

Efstathios Christodoulides, Andrew Sprake, A. D. Thomson, Charles F. Palmer et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Education
Physical Education and Pedagogy
3.44
article

The epistemic judgement framework: a reflexive tool for physical education teachers’ professional development to support Quality Physical Education

Efstathios Christodoulides, Andrew Sprake, A. D. Thomson, Charles F. Palmer, David Grečić
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The need for Quality Physical Education to provide the many benefits the subject offers is well established. Unfortunately, in too many areas ineffective teaching and learning practices are limiting the profession’s response to children’s developmental needs. Many teachers’ professional development interventions are criticised as not enabling the required philosophical, and pedagogical shifts that are needed to improve practice and student outcomes. The paper presents a new integrated model, the Epistemic Judgement Framework to enhance this process. Epistemology offers an important lens by which to explore teacher beliefs and behaviors, however, existing research in this field is very specific in scope, which makes learning transfer difficult. To better explore this area a fuller appreciation of the bioecological environment in which teaching takes place as well as the Critical Realist view of the teaching world is introduced. The purpose of this article therefore is to propose a framework to guide teacher professional development to support the achievement of Quality Physical Education that merges environmental considerations and exploration of hidden influencers with epistemological research on teacher decision making and behavior. Practical applications for teacher professional learning utilizing the model and future directions are suggested.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 9
University of Lancashire (GB), University of Central Lancashire Cyprus (CY)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Physical Education and Pedagogy
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.