Understanding and simulating cropland and non-cropland burning in Europe using the BASE (Burnt Area Simulator for Europe) model

Abstract. Fire interacts with many parts of the Earth system. However, its drivers are myriad and complex, interacting differently in different regions depending on prevailing climate regimes, vegetation types, socioeconomic development, and land use and management. Europe is facing strong increases in projected fire weather danger as a consequence of climate change and has experienced extreme fire seasons and events in recent years. Here, we focus on understanding and simulating burnt area across a European study domain using remote sensing data and generalised linear models (GLMs). We first examined fire occurrence across land cover types and found that all non-cropland vegetation (NCV) types (comprising 26 % of burnt area) burnt with similar spatial and temporal patterns, which were very distinct from those in croplands (74 % of burnt area). We then used GLMs to predict cropland and NCV burnt area at ∼9×9 km and monthly spatial and temporal resolution, respectively, which together we termed BASE (Burnt Area Simulator for Europe). Compared to satellite burnt area products, BASE effectively captured the general spatial and temporal patterns of burning, explaining 32 % (NCV) and 36 % (cropland) of the deviance, and performed similarly to state-of-the-art global fire models. The most important drivers were fire weather and monthly indices derived from gross primary productivity followed by coarse socioeconomic indicators and vegetation properties. Crucially, we found that the drivers of cropland and NCV burning were very different, highlighting the importance of simulating burning in different land cover types separately. Through the choice of predictor variables, BASE was designed for coupling with dynamic vegetation and Earth system models and thus enabling future projections. The strong model skill of BASE when reproducing seasonal and interannual dynamics of NCV burning and the novel inclusion of cropland burning indicate that BASE is well suited for integration in land surface models. In addition to this, the BASE framework may serve as a basis for further studies using additional predictors to further elucidate drivers of fire in Europe. Through these applications, we suggest BASE may be a useful tool for understanding, and therefore adapting to, the increasing fire risk in Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biogeosciences
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5539-2024
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding and simulating cropland and non-cropland burning in Europe using the BASE (Burnt Area Simulator for Europe) model

Kirsten Thonicke, Dan L. Warren, Maik Billing, Matthew Forrest et al.
7 citations
Biogeosciences
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.98
article

Understanding and simulating cropland and non-cropland burning in Europe using the BASE (Burnt Area Simulator for Europe) model

Kirsten Thonicke, Dan L. Warren, Maik Billing, Matthew Forrest, Fátima Arrogante‐Funes, Oliver Perkins, Luke Oberhagemann, Jessica Hetzer, Eric Kosczor, Thomas Hickler, Simon P. K. Bowring
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Fire interacts with many parts of the Earth system. However, its drivers are myriad and complex, interacting differently in different regions depending on prevailing climate regimes, vegetation types, socioeconomic development, and land use and management. Europe is facing strong increases in projected fire weather danger as a consequence of climate change and has experienced extreme fire seasons and events in recent years. Here, we focus on understanding and simulating burnt area across a European study domain using remote sensing data and generalised linear models (GLMs). We first examined fire occurrence across land cover types and found that all non-cropland vegetation (NCV) types (comprising 26 % of burnt area) burnt with similar spatial and temporal patterns, which were very distinct from those in croplands (74 % of burnt area). We then used GLMs to predict cropland and NCV burnt area at ∼9×9 km and monthly spatial and temporal resolution, respectively, which together we termed BASE (Burnt Area Simulator for Europe). Compared to satellite burnt area products, BASE effectively captured the general spatial and temporal patterns of burning, explaining 32 % (NCV) and 36 % (cropland) of the deviance, and performed similarly to state-of-the-art global fire models. The most important drivers were fire weather and monthly indices derived from gross primary productivity followed by coarse socioeconomic indicators and vegetation properties. Crucially, we found that the drivers of cropland and NCV burning were very different, highlighting the importance of simulating burning in different land cover types separately. Through the choice of predictor variables, BASE was designed for coupling with dynamic vegetation and Earth system models and thus enabling future projections. The strong model skill of BASE when reproducing seasonal and interannual dynamics of NCV burning and the novel inclusion of cropland burning indicate that BASE is well suited for integration in land surface models. In addition to this, the BASE framework may serve as a basis for further studies using additional predictors to further elucidate drivers of fire in Europe. Through these applications, we suggest BASE may be a useful tool for understanding, and therefore adapting to, the increasing fire risk in Europe.

BiogeosciencesVol. 21(23)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP), Charles Sturt University (AU), University of Potsdam (DE), King's College London (GB), Universidad de Alcalá (ES), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Leibniz Association (DE), Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (DE), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Laboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (FR), Laboratoire de Géologie de l’École Normale Supérieure (FR), Imperial College London (GB), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Leverhulme Trust, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.