Places that matter and places that don’t: territorial revenge and counter-revenge in Poland

This article examines the persistence of territorial inequality and the challenges posed by growing geographic political polarisation, using Poland as a compelling case study. In 2015, the anti-elite and Eurosceptic PiS party came to power, holding it for eight years before losing to a broad coalition of liberal, centrist, and left-wing parties. We study the geography of this political shift by analysing parliamentary election results from 2011 to 2023 against the backdrop of growing regional socio-economic divides. Our findings reveal that the support base of the PiS gradually expanded in areas characterised by multidimensional peripherality, aligning with the theory of the ‘revenge of places that do not matter’. Meanwhile, the recent victory of the liberal coalition can be attributed to the political mobilisation of prosperous core areas – a ‘counter-revenge of places that matter’ – which has further intensified the geography of political polarisation in Poland.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Territory Politics Governance
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2024.2431702
Primary Topic
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Places that matter and places that don’t: territorial revenge and counter-revenge in Poland

Barbara Szyda, Anna Dubownik, Paweł Churski, Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose et al.
Territory Politics Governance
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
article

Places that matter and places that don’t: territorial revenge and counter-revenge in Poland

Barbara Szyda, Anna Dubownik, Paweł Churski, Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, Maciej Pietrzykowski, Piotr Rosik, Czesław Adamiak
article en

Abstract

This article examines the persistence of territorial inequality and the challenges posed by growing geographic political polarisation, using Poland as a compelling case study. In 2015, the anti-elite and Eurosceptic PiS party came to power, holding it for eight years before losing to a broad coalition of liberal, centrist, and left-wing parties. We study the geography of this political shift by analysing parliamentary election results from 2011 to 2023 against the backdrop of growing regional socio-economic divides. Our findings reveal that the support base of the PiS gradually expanded in areas characterised by multidimensional peripherality, aligning with the theory of the ‘revenge of places that do not matter’. Meanwhile, the recent victory of the liberal coalition can be attributed to the political mobilisation of prosperous core areas – a ‘counter-revenge of places that matter’ – which has further intensified the geography of political polarisation in Poland.

Territory Politics GovernanceVol. 14(1)
Poznań University of Economics and Business (PL), Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL), Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences (PL), Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Narodowym Centrum Nauki
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.