Interactions Between Multiple Physical Particle Injection Pumps in the Southern Ocean

Abstract Contributions to the biological pump that arise from the physical circulation are referred to as physical particle injection pumps. A synthesized view of how these physical pumps interact with each other and other components of the biological pump does not yet exist. Here, observations from a quasi‐Lagrangian float and an ocean glider, deployed in the Southern Ocean's Subantarctic Zone for one month during the spring bloom, offer insight into daily‐to‐monthly fluctuations in the mixed layer pump (MLP) and the eddy subduction pump (ESP). Estimated independently, each mechanism contributes intermittent export fluxes of roughly several hundred milligrams of particulate organic carbon (POC) per square meter per day. The glider‐based estimates indicate sustained weekly periods of MLP export fluxes across the base of the mixed layer with a magnitude of mg POC . Potential export fluxes from the ESP, based on a mixed layer instability scaling, occasionally exceed 400 mg POC , with export elevated due to both strong inferred vertical velocities and enhanced isopycnal slopes. Significant export fluxes from the ESP are localized to the edges of mesoscale eddies and to fronts, whereas the MLP acts more broadly due to the larger scales of atmospheric forcing. Regimes occur when MLP and ESP export fluxes can have either the same or opposite sign. Simple summation of fluxes from existing parameterizations of the two pumps likely misrepresents the total physical carbon flux. Insights into how mesoscale stirring and submesoscale velocities set POC vertical structure is a key target to reduce uncertainty in global carbon export fluxes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gb008122
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interactions Between Multiple Physical Particle Injection Pumps in the Southern Ocean

Léo Lacour, Lilian A. Dove, Ellie Flint, Andrew F. Thompson et al.
4 citations
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
1.92
article

Interactions Between Multiple Physical Particle Injection Pumps in the Southern Ocean

Léo Lacour, Lilian A. Dove, Ellie Flint, Andrew F. Thompson, Philip W. Boyd
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Contributions to the biological pump that arise from the physical circulation are referred to as physical particle injection pumps. A synthesized view of how these physical pumps interact with each other and other components of the biological pump does not yet exist. Here, observations from a quasi‐Lagrangian float and an ocean glider, deployed in the Southern Ocean's Subantarctic Zone for one month during the spring bloom, offer insight into daily‐to‐monthly fluctuations in the mixed layer pump (MLP) and the eddy subduction pump (ESP). Estimated independently, each mechanism contributes intermittent export fluxes of roughly several hundred milligrams of particulate organic carbon (POC) per square meter per day. The glider‐based estimates indicate sustained weekly periods of MLP export fluxes across the base of the mixed layer with a magnitude of mg POC . Potential export fluxes from the ESP, based on a mixed layer instability scaling, occasionally exceed 400 mg POC , with export elevated due to both strong inferred vertical velocities and enhanced isopycnal slopes. Significant export fluxes from the ESP are localized to the edges of mesoscale eddies and to fronts, whereas the MLP acts more broadly due to the larger scales of atmospheric forcing. Regimes occur when MLP and ESP export fluxes can have either the same or opposite sign. Simple summation of fluxes from existing parameterizations of the two pumps likely misrepresents the total physical carbon flux. Insights into how mesoscale stirring and submesoscale velocities set POC vertical structure is a key target to reduce uncertainty in global carbon export fluxes.

Global Biogeochemical CyclesVol. 38(12)
California Institute of Technology (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Tasmania (AU), Brown University (US), University of California San Diego (US), Sorbonne Université (FR), Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche (FR)
Resnick Sustainability Institute for Science, Energy and Sustainability, California Institute of Technology, Australian Research Council, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
1.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.