Comparison of Streptococcus mutans Adhesion with Different Concentrations in Artificial Saliva to Fixed Orthodontic Materials in Laboratory Conditions

Abstract Background: Biofilm accumulation is a common complication of orthodontic treatment, occurring in approximately 60% of patients. The irregular surfaces of orthodontic appliances (archwires, brackets, and braces) create retention areas that hinder effective oral hygiene, increase bacterial load, and alter oral microbiota, potentially leading to pathogenic species proliferation. In addition, factors such as buffering capacity, pH levels, and saliva flow are crucial for optimal oral function and caries prevention. This study aimed to compare the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans at different concentrations in artificial saliva to fixed orthodontic materials under laboratory conditions. Methods: S. mutans strains were obtained from the National Center for Genetic and Biological Resources in Tehran, along with normal artificial saliva prepared with pH values of 5 and 7. Bacterial adhesion was quantified by counting colony-forming units on culture media. The effects of bracket type, archwire material, composite type, and saliva pH on bacterial adhesion were analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations with a significance level of 0.05, employing SPSS software (version 26). Results: A significant difference in adhesion rates of S. mutans was observed between different archwire types at both pH levels ( P = 0.001). However, no significant differences were found in adhesion rates among the three bracket types (plastic, metal, and ceramic) or between self-cure and light-cure composites at both pH levels. Overall, the study indicated a significant interaction effect among archwire type, bracket type, and composite type on bacterial adhesion. Conclusion: The adhesion of S. mutans to orthodontic materials in laboratory conditions is influenced by archwire type but not by bracket type or composite type. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate orthodontic materials to mitigate bacterial adhesion and improve oral health outcomes during treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal (BBRJ)
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_276_24
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Streptococcus mutans Adhesion with Different Concentrations in Artificial Saliva to Fixed Orthodontic Materials in Laboratory Conditions

Shadab Safarzadeh Khosroshahi, Ahmad Sheibaninia, Seyyed Khalil Shokouhi Mostafavi, Mohammad Javad Kharazi Fard et al.
3 citations
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal (BBRJ)
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
1.20
article

Comparison of Streptococcus mutans Adhesion with Different Concentrations in Artificial Saliva to Fixed Orthodontic Materials in Laboratory Conditions

Shadab Safarzadeh Khosroshahi, Ahmad Sheibaninia, Seyyed Khalil Shokouhi Mostafavi, Mohammad Javad Kharazi Fard, Leila Mohammadpour Belvirdy
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background: Biofilm accumulation is a common complication of orthodontic treatment, occurring in approximately 60% of patients. The irregular surfaces of orthodontic appliances (archwires, brackets, and braces) create retention areas that hinder effective oral hygiene, increase bacterial load, and alter oral microbiota, potentially leading to pathogenic species proliferation. In addition, factors such as buffering capacity, pH levels, and saliva flow are crucial for optimal oral function and caries prevention. This study aimed to compare the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans at different concentrations in artificial saliva to fixed orthodontic materials under laboratory conditions. Methods: S. mutans strains were obtained from the National Center for Genetic and Biological Resources in Tehran, along with normal artificial saliva prepared with pH values of 5 and 7. Bacterial adhesion was quantified by counting colony-forming units on culture media. The effects of bracket type, archwire material, composite type, and saliva pH on bacterial adhesion were analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations with a significance level of 0.05, employing SPSS software (version 26). Results: A significant difference in adhesion rates of S. mutans was observed between different archwire types at both pH levels ( P = 0.001). However, no significant differences were found in adhesion rates among the three bracket types (plastic, metal, and ceramic) or between self-cure and light-cure composites at both pH levels. Overall, the study indicated a significant interaction effect among archwire type, bracket type, and composite type on bacterial adhesion. Conclusion: The adhesion of S. mutans to orthodontic materials in laboratory conditions is influenced by archwire type but not by bracket type or composite type. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate orthodontic materials to mitigate bacterial adhesion and improve oral health outcomes during treatment.

Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal (BBRJ)Vol. 8(4)
Islamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.