Cross‐Institutional Mentoring: A Catalyst for Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in STEMM Interventions

ABSTRACT Bold interventions are needed to change racial disparities and unacceptably low STEMM completion rates at historically white institutions that have the resources to train a new generation of scientists with diverse backgrounds. Three university case studies were conducted on the Meyerhoff Adaptation Partnership, which sought to develop student‐centered programs to improve student outcomes and change STEMM institutional cultures. We employ an institutionally‐focused approach to examine how the collaboration facilitated the development and mutual learning of equity‐minded schemas to challenge dominant racial logic that stifles diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEMM. The study expounds on how dialogic cross‐institutional mentoring works, including how participants learned from each other at multiple levels across institutions to advance fundamental values and practices that hold promise for inclusive approaches in STEMM. The study shows how mentoring relationships support change agents in implementing, sustaining, and institutionalizing STEMM interventions that seek to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion on their campuses. Discussed is the value of the cross‐institutional mentoring model to share and co‐create innovative strategies, expand professional development for institutional agents, affirm change agents, and overcome program challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Education
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21930
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross‐Institutional Mentoring: A Catalyst for Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in STEMM Interventions

Channel C. McLewis, Sylvia Hurtado, Nathalie Noël, Edwin Perez et al.
2 citations
Science Education
Mentoring and Academic Development
1.29
article

Cross‐Institutional Mentoring: A Catalyst for Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in STEMM Interventions

Channel C. McLewis, Sylvia Hurtado, Nathalie Noël, Edwin Perez, Denise Ortiz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bold interventions are needed to change racial disparities and unacceptably low STEMM completion rates at historically white institutions that have the resources to train a new generation of scientists with diverse backgrounds. Three university case studies were conducted on the Meyerhoff Adaptation Partnership, which sought to develop student‐centered programs to improve student outcomes and change STEMM institutional cultures. We employ an institutionally‐focused approach to examine how the collaboration facilitated the development and mutual learning of equity‐minded schemas to challenge dominant racial logic that stifles diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEMM. The study expounds on how dialogic cross‐institutional mentoring works, including how participants learned from each other at multiple levels across institutions to advance fundamental values and practices that hold promise for inclusive approaches in STEMM. The study shows how mentoring relationships support change agents in implementing, sustaining, and institutionalizing STEMM interventions that seek to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion on their campuses. Discussed is the value of the cross‐institutional mentoring model to share and co‐create innovative strategies, expand professional development for institutional agents, affirm change agents, and overcome program challenges.

Science EducationVol. 109(3)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), California Department of Education (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Mentoring and Academic Development
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.