Stacked economization: a research program for the study of platforms

Conceived as a sequel to our papers on economization and marketization (Caliskan and Callon 2009; 2010), This article presents a research program for analyzing platforms. Caliskan and Callon (2009) have defined economization as the design and qualification of devices, agencies, representations, networks, and their distributed relations as ‘economic’ by social scientists and market actors. The second installment has presented marketization as a mode of economization that facilitates transactions with money within a socio-technical agencement on a space of power (Caliskan and Callon 2010). Updating our previous definitions and literature review, we turn our attention in this installment to platforms and propose an alternative approach. Critiquing two hegemonic perspectives on platforms – Platform Anachronism (platforms as mere markets with multiple sides) and Platform Reductionism (platforms as mere surveillance systems) – we define a platform as (1) a stacked economization process bringing together a variety of agencements such as gift, barter, and market, (2) which provides actors with tools of redefining their needs within an exploration space, (3) entailing layered relations of power. We argue that the program of platform study we describe in this paper provides researchers, economic actors, and policymakers with agile and effective tools of analysis, economization, and regulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cultural Economy
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2024.2423687
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stacked economization: a research program for the study of platforms

Donald MacKenzie, Koray Çalışkan, Michel Callon
12 citations
Journal of Cultural Economy
Digital Platforms and Economics
6.66
article

Stacked economization: a research program for the study of platforms

Donald MacKenzie, Koray Çalışkan, Michel Callon
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Conceived as a sequel to our papers on economization and marketization (Caliskan and Callon 2009; 2010), This article presents a research program for analyzing platforms. Caliskan and Callon (2009) have defined economization as the design and qualification of devices, agencies, representations, networks, and their distributed relations as ‘economic’ by social scientists and market actors. The second installment has presented marketization as a mode of economization that facilitates transactions with money within a socio-technical agencement on a space of power (Caliskan and Callon 2010). Updating our previous definitions and literature review, we turn our attention in this installment to platforms and propose an alternative approach. Critiquing two hegemonic perspectives on platforms – Platform Anachronism (platforms as mere markets with multiple sides) and Platform Reductionism (platforms as mere surveillance systems) – we define a platform as (1) a stacked economization process bringing together a variety of agencements such as gift, barter, and market, (2) which provides actors with tools of redefining their needs within an exploration space, (3) entailing layered relations of power. We argue that the program of platform study we describe in this paper provides researchers, economic actors, and policymakers with agile and effective tools of analysis, economization, and regulation.

Journal of Cultural EconomyVol. 18(2)
The New School (US), Parsons School of Design (US), École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (FR), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Platforms and Economics
6.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.