A Comparative Study of Traditional vs. Automated BIM-LCA Methods for Embodied Carbon Assessment

This study explores the integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to improve the assessment of Embodied Carbon (EC) in building materials, aiming to enhance sustainability in the construction industry. The research compares traditional manual LCA (Type I) with an automated BIM-LCA approach (Type II), utilizing Autodesk Revit and Python programming for enhanced accuracy and efficiency. The methodology is demonstrated through a case study of The London College, a 2500 m² educational building. Results show that the Type II integration method significantly reduces assessment time while maintaining high accuracy, with discrepancies between the methods being less than 1%. This automation enables detailed EC assessments early in the design process, facilitating informed decision-making and optimizing material choices to reduce carbon emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Future Sustainability
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36828/efs.265
Citations
6
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Traditional vs. Automated BIM-LCA Methods for Embodied Carbon Assessment

Ali Bahadori‐Jahromi, Maryam Keyhani, Paulina B Godfrey
6 citations
Engineering Future Sustainability
BIM and Construction Integration
1.59
article

A Comparative Study of Traditional vs. Automated BIM-LCA Methods for Embodied Carbon Assessment

Ali Bahadori‐Jahromi, Maryam Keyhani, Paulina B Godfrey
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study explores the integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to improve the assessment of Embodied Carbon (EC) in building materials, aiming to enhance sustainability in the construction industry. The research compares traditional manual LCA (Type I) with an automated BIM-LCA approach (Type II), utilizing Autodesk Revit and Python programming for enhanced accuracy and efficiency. The methodology is demonstrated through a case study of The London College, a 2500 m² educational building. Results show that the Type II integration method significantly reduces assessment time while maintaining high accuracy, with discrepancies between the methods being less than 1%. This automation enables detailed EC assessments early in the design process, facilitating informed decision-making and optimizing material choices to reduce carbon emissions.

Engineering Future SustainabilityVol. 1(4)
University of West London (GB)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
BIM and Construction Integration
1.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study of Traditional vs. Automated BIM-LCA Methods for Embodied Carbon Assessment — Ali Bahadori‐Jahromi, Maryam Keyhani, et al. · Engineering Future Sustainability (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS