Identifying Priority Conservation Areas in Shennongjia National Park Based on Monetary Costs and Zonation Model

Identifying priority conservation areas (PCAs) for national parks is critical for improving the cost-effectiveness and viability of conservation efforts, given the multiplicity of conservation values, the complexity of human activities, and the limited financial resources available. Assessing conservation costs is central to systematic conservation planning (SCP). To compensate for the limitations of the alternative cost method in small-scale case studies and accurately reflect the cost differences due to specific land use, tenure, and management strategies, conservation costs are quantified and spatialized in this study using monetization methods. Taking Shennongjia National Park (SNP) as an example, we considered the core conservation values of species, ecosystems, and geological heritage, using the Zonation 5 model to identify PCAs under three different targets: 17%, 30%, and 50%. The results indicated that, as the conservation targets increased, PCAs expanded from the central and southern high-altitude areas to the northwest and northeast. Conservation gaps are primarily concentrated in the western part of Songluo and the northern parts of Hongping and Songba. Conservation costs exhibit clear spatial heterogeneity, increasing gradually from the central high mountains towards the surrounding areas. Among these, ecological compensation cost was the primary factor driving the sharp increase in total costs, while opportunity cost remained consistently low with minimal fluctuations. Compared to the alternative method, our study clarified the spatial distribution and types of costs in the process of national park construction, providing a quantitative basis and scientific guidance for future fiscal investment directions, methods, and responsible entities. At the administrative division level, we revealed the main cost challenges faced by townships in balancing resource conservation with community development, leading to more targeted, timely, and actionable community governance strategies. These findings further illustrate the significant advantages of using monetary costs in optimizing the boundaries of individual national parks and enhancing funding allocation efficiency, while promoting effective unified management of natural resource assets within spatial planning.