Optimizing Swine Oral Fluid Sampling Procedures for Growing Pigs in Commercial Settings

Pen-based oral fluids are used extensively for surveillance and disease detection in swine, but there is sparse information on the sampling process itself. To address this shortcoming, we documented the pen-based oral fluid sampling process with the aim of optimizing the number of pigs in a pen that contributed to the sample. We quantified the effects of (1) previous experience with rope sampling (training), (2) the number of ropes suspended in the pen, and (3) sampling time on pig participation and pig-rope contact. A subset of pigs was clearly marked for individual identification and their interactions with ropes video recorded. Thereafter, pig-rope contacts were counted from the recordings, with "contact" defined as an individually identified pig clearly taking the rope into its mouth. Data were analyzed using appropriate models (R version 4.4.1 R core team 2024). Training, provision of additional ropes, and extended sampling time all increased pig participation across pen sizes. However, for routine oral fluid collection in the field, we recommend training pigs prior to hanging ropes for sample collection and increasing sampling time to maximize the pigs' contribution to the oral fluid sample. Importantly, these studies focused on pig behavior and not detection; thus, future studies should evaluate the impact of these same factors on the probability of detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pathogens
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121097
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Swine Oral Fluid Sampling Procedures for Growing Pigs in Commercial Settings

Sarah R. Mielke, Marta D. Remmenga, Pam Zaabel, Kathleen C. O’Hara et al.
3 citations
Pathogens
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
1.91
article

Optimizing Swine Oral Fluid Sampling Procedures for Growing Pigs in Commercial Settings

Sarah R. Mielke, Marta D. Remmenga, Pam Zaabel, Kathleen C. O’Hara, Jeffrey J. Zimmerman, Marisa Rotolo, Marian Talbert, Grzegorz Tarasiuk, Danyang Zhang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Pen-based oral fluids are used extensively for surveillance and disease detection in swine, but there is sparse information on the sampling process itself. To address this shortcoming, we documented the pen-based oral fluid sampling process with the aim of optimizing the number of pigs in a pen that contributed to the sample. We quantified the effects of (1) previous experience with rope sampling (training), (2) the number of ropes suspended in the pen, and (3) sampling time on pig participation and pig-rope contact. A subset of pigs was clearly marked for individual identification and their interactions with ropes video recorded. Thereafter, pig-rope contacts were counted from the recordings, with "contact" defined as an individually identified pig clearly taking the rope into its mouth. Data were analyzed using appropriate models (R version 4.4.1 R core team 2024). Training, provision of additional ropes, and extended sampling time all increased pig participation across pen sizes. However, for routine oral fluid collection in the field, we recommend training pigs prior to hanging ropes for sample collection and increasing sampling time to maximize the pigs' contribution to the oral fluid sample. Importantly, these studies focused on pig behavior and not detection; thus, future studies should evaluate the impact of these same factors on the probability of detection.

PathogensVol. 13(12)
Iowa State University (US), National Pork Board (US), Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Iowa State University, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.