The Drawing Effect: Does Drawing Really Enhance Recall Memory?

There is some evidence that the best strategy for remembering text-based information is drawing when using a mixed list design where participants both draw and write in the same list. There is also some evidence that the memory benefits of drawing are reduced when using a pure list design where participants draw or write in separate lists. In this study ( n = 91), we compared three encoding strategies for recalling a list of scientific terms and their definitions: drawing, paraphrasing, and writing the definitions, and randomly assigned participants to a condition. We also examined individual difference factors that might impact these encoding strategies. We found no difference across conditions. Instead, drawing abilities, working memory, and familiarity for what was to be remembered predicted recall performance. We conclude that more research is needed before declaring a “drawing effect,” since the effect is reduced when using a pure list design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Empirical Studies of the Arts
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374241303266
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Drawing Effect: Does Drawing Really Enhance Recall Memory?

Kaile Smith, Jennifer E. Drake, Susanna Mykoniatis
Empirical Studies of the Arts
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
article

The Drawing Effect: Does Drawing Really Enhance Recall Memory?

Kaile Smith, Jennifer E. Drake, Susanna Mykoniatis
article en

Abstract

There is some evidence that the best strategy for remembering text-based information is drawing when using a mixed list design where participants both draw and write in the same list. There is also some evidence that the memory benefits of drawing are reduced when using a pure list design where participants draw or write in separate lists. In this study ( n = 91), we compared three encoding strategies for recalling a list of scientific terms and their definitions: drawing, paraphrasing, and writing the definitions, and randomly assigned participants to a condition. We also examined individual difference factors that might impact these encoding strategies. We found no difference across conditions. Instead, drawing abilities, working memory, and familiarity for what was to be remembered predicted recall performance. We conclude that more research is needed before declaring a “drawing effect,” since the effect is reduced when using a pure list design.

Empirical Studies of the ArtsVol. 43(2)
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), Northeastern University (US), City University of New York (US), Brooklyn College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Drawing Effect: Does Drawing Really Enhance Recall Memory? — Kaile Smith, Jennifer E. Drake, et al. · Empirical Studies of the Arts (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS