On the open borders of information and consultation rights in the EU <i>acquis</i>

Developments in the world of work in the last few years have resulted in an increasing number of working patterns that fall outside the scope of standard employment. In the area of digital work, in particular, more and more economically dependent employee-like workers can be found. The question therefore arises as to whether those who are not typical employees are included in the scope of protection of EU labour law. It is unclear, for example, whether one of the most important labour rights – the right to information and consultation – also applies to non-standard workers (section 1). This article addresses the question of the extent to which EU labour law de lege lata permits or even provides for the inclusion of non-standard employees in the scope of information and consultation rights. To answer this question, relevant legal acts are first analysed. In most cases, it is up to the Member States to regulate the respective scope of application and thus to include non-standard workers (sections 2 and 3). 1 Subsequently, a possible solution for an extension of information and consultation rights for non-standard workers is proposed. The developed risk approach shows that a solution should also be found at Union level for the inclusion of non-standard workers, especially in the case of employee-like workers, as they are often subject to the same risks as employees. However, a broad interpretation of Art. 27 CFR can lead to the conclusion that employee-like workers must be included at both Union and national levels (section 4).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Labour Law Journal
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525241293734
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the open borders of information and consultation rights in the EU acquis

Lidia Gil Otero, Christina Schnittler
European Labour Law Journal
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

On the open borders of information and consultation rights in the EU acquis

Lidia Gil Otero, Christina Schnittler
article en

Abstract

Developments in the world of work in the last few years have resulted in an increasing number of working patterns that fall outside the scope of standard employment. In the area of digital work, in particular, more and more economically dependent employee-like workers can be found. The question therefore arises as to whether those who are not typical employees are included in the scope of protection of EU labour law. It is unclear, for example, whether one of the most important labour rights – the right to information and consultation – also applies to non-standard workers (section 1). This article addresses the question of the extent to which EU labour law de lege lata permits or even provides for the inclusion of non-standard employees in the scope of information and consultation rights. To answer this question, relevant legal acts are first analysed. In most cases, it is up to the Member States to regulate the respective scope of application and thus to include non-standard workers (sections 2 and 3). 1 Subsequently, a possible solution for an extension of information and consultation rights for non-standard workers is proposed. The developed risk approach shows that a solution should also be found at Union level for the inclusion of non-standard workers, especially in the case of employee-like workers, as they are often subject to the same risks as employees. However, a broad interpretation of Art. 27 CFR can lead to the conclusion that employee-like workers must be included at both Union and national levels (section 4).

European Labour Law JournalVol. 16(2)
University of Vienna (AT), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the open borders of information and consultation rights in the EU <i>acquis</i> — Lidia Gil Otero, Christina Schnittler · European Labour Law Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS