Panacea or overload? – an analysis of the latest legal developments in the EU network tariff regulation and its role in supporting the transformation to e-mobility

The paper analyzed the network tariff regulation at the EU level with a special focus on its role in supporting the transformation to e-mobility. Using traditional legal interpretation methods it shows how the complex and unsystematic legal framework can be made comprehensible and operable. The principle of cost-reflective non-discrimination is identified as the central guideline for network tariff regulation. Although there are many possible exceptions to this principle, they are not unlimited and are subject to a strict proportionality test. The paper points out that the expansion of the objectives resulting from the most recent reform of the legal text entails the risk that the legal framework will become dysfunctional due to its far-reaching mandate. Finally, the possibilities of incentivizing e-mobility through grid charges are evaluated, and the potential benefits of limiting the legal framework for network tariff regulation to its core are pointed out.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IET conference proceedings.
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2024.3735
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Law, logistics, and international trade
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Panacea or overload? – an analysis of the latest legal developments in the EU network tariff regulation and its role in supporting the transformation to e-mobility

Tobias Klarmann
1 citations
IET conference proceedings.
Law, logistics, and international trade
0.95
article

Panacea or overload? – an analysis of the latest legal developments in the EU network tariff regulation and its role in supporting the transformation to e-mobility

Tobias Klarmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The paper analyzed the network tariff regulation at the EU level with a special focus on its role in supporting the transformation to e-mobility. Using traditional legal interpretation methods it shows how the complex and unsystematic legal framework can be made comprehensible and operable. The principle of cost-reflective non-discrimination is identified as the central guideline for network tariff regulation. Although there are many possible exceptions to this principle, they are not unlimited and are subject to a strict proportionality test. The paper points out that the expansion of the objectives resulting from the most recent reform of the legal text entails the risk that the legal framework will become dysfunctional due to its far-reaching mandate. Finally, the possibilities of incentivizing e-mobility through grid charges are evaluated, and the potential benefits of limiting the legal framework for network tariff regulation to its core are pointed out.

IET conference proceedings.Vol. 2024(15)
Stiftung Umweltenergierecht (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Law, logistics, and international trade
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.