Autonomous medical evaluation for guideline adherence of large language models

Autonomous Medical Evaluation for Guideline Adherence (AMEGA) is a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate large language models' adherence to medical guidelines across 20 diagnostic scenarios spanning 13 specialties. It includes an evaluation framework and methodology to assess models' capabilities in medical reasoning, differential diagnosis, treatment planning, and guideline adherence, using open-ended questions that mirror real-world clinical interactions. It includes 135 questions and 1337 weighted scoring elements designed to assess comprehensive medical knowledge. In tests of 17 LLMs, GPT-4 scored highest with 41.9/50, followed closely by Llama-3 70B and WizardLM-2-8x22B. For comparison, a recent medical graduate scored 25.8/50. The benchmark introduces novel content to avoid the issue of LLMs memorizing existing medical data. AMEGA's publicly available code supports further research in AI-assisted clinical decision-making, aiming to enhance patient care by aiding clinicians in diagnosis and treatment under time constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01356-6
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Autonomous medical evaluation for guideline adherence of large language models

Lisa C. Adams, Keno K. Bressem, Daniel Truhn, Robert Siepmann et al.
19 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Machine Learning in Healthcare
6.60
article

Autonomous medical evaluation for guideline adherence of large language models

Lisa C. Adams, Keno K. Bressem, Daniel Truhn, Robert Siepmann, Felix Busch, Marcus R. Makowski, Nadine Bayerl, Marc Huppertz, Alexander Löser, Philipp Prucker, Conor Fallon, Dennis Fast
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Autonomous Medical Evaluation for Guideline Adherence (AMEGA) is a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate large language models' adherence to medical guidelines across 20 diagnostic scenarios spanning 13 specialties. It includes an evaluation framework and methodology to assess models' capabilities in medical reasoning, differential diagnosis, treatment planning, and guideline adherence, using open-ended questions that mirror real-world clinical interactions. It includes 135 questions and 1337 weighted scoring elements designed to assess comprehensive medical knowledge. In tests of 17 LLMs, GPT-4 scored highest with 41.9/50, followed closely by Llama-3 70B and WizardLM-2-8x22B. For comparison, a recent medical graduate scored 25.8/50. The benchmark introduces novel content to avoid the issue of LLMs memorizing existing medical data. AMEGA's publicly available code supports further research in AI-assisted clinical decision-making, aiming to enhance patient care by aiding clinicians in diagnosis and treatment under time constraints.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 7(1)
Berliner Hochschule für Technik (DE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), TUM Klinikum (DE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE), Deutsches Herzzentrum München (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Australian Government, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Technische Universität München
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
6.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.