Graphene or MoS<sub>2</sub> nanopores: pore adhesion and protein linearization

Nanopores drilled in materials can electrophoretically drive charged biomolecules to enable their detection. Here, we explore and compare two-dimensional nanopores, graphene and MoS<sub>2</sub>, in order to unravel their advantages and disadvantages with regard to protein detection. We tuned the protein translocation and its dynamics by the choice and concentration of the surrounding solvent. For this, we used a typical monovalent salt solution, as well as a molecular solution. We assessed, with the aid of atomistic simulations, the efficiency of both nanopores in threading the protein on the basis of measurable ionic current signals. In the case of graphene, the protein adheres on the graphene surface, hindering the translocation under physiological conditions. This stickiness is resolved with the addition of a denaturant by the formation of a hydrophilic cationic layer on the pore surface and the protein can thread the pore in a linearized configuration. On the other hand, the MoS<sub>2</sub> nanopores can thread the protein also in a physiological solution, leading to longer passage times, while the degree of protein linearization is lower than in the case of graphene in a molecular solution. We analyze the differences between the two nanopore materials on the basis of the complex molecular interactions between all components, the material, the target protein, and the solvent. We discuss the relevance of the results with respect to controlling the protein dynamics and enhancing the read-out ionic signals in view of an efficient detection of proteins through 2D nanopores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nanoscale
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d4nr03966a
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Graphene or MoS2 nanopores: pore adhesion and protein linearization

Maria Fyta, Peng Wei, Mayukh Kansari
1 citations
Nanoscale
Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
0.18
article

Graphene or MoS2 nanopores: pore adhesion and protein linearization

Maria Fyta, Peng Wei, Mayukh Kansari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Nanopores drilled in materials can electrophoretically drive charged biomolecules to enable their detection. Here, we explore and compare two-dimensional nanopores, graphene and MoS<sub>2</sub>, in order to unravel their advantages and disadvantages with regard to protein detection. We tuned the protein translocation and its dynamics by the choice and concentration of the surrounding solvent. For this, we used a typical monovalent salt solution, as well as a molecular solution. We assessed, with the aid of atomistic simulations, the efficiency of both nanopores in threading the protein on the basis of measurable ionic current signals. In the case of graphene, the protein adheres on the graphene surface, hindering the translocation under physiological conditions. This stickiness is resolved with the addition of a denaturant by the formation of a hydrophilic cationic layer on the pore surface and the protein can thread the pore in a linearized configuration. On the other hand, the MoS<sub>2</sub> nanopores can thread the protein also in a physiological solution, leading to longer passage times, while the degree of protein linearization is lower than in the case of graphene in a molecular solution. We analyze the differences between the two nanopore materials on the basis of the complex molecular interactions between all components, the material, the target protein, and the solvent. We discuss the relevance of the results with respect to controlling the protein dynamics and enhancing the read-out ionic signals in view of an efficient detection of proteins through 2D nanopores.

NanoscaleVol. 17(7)
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, RWTH Aachen University
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.