A comparison of scoring algorithms for the NIH Toolbox executive function tasks in a U.S. norming sample.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Assessment
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001350
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of scoring algorithms for the NIH Toolbox executive function tasks in a U.S. norming sample.

Berivan Ece, Erica M. LaForte, Emily Ho, Aaron J. Kaat et al.
2 citations
Psychological Assessment
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
1.02
article

A comparison of scoring algorithms for the NIH Toolbox executive function tasks in a U.S. norming sample.

Berivan Ece, Erica M. LaForte, Emily Ho, Aaron J. Kaat, Richard C Gershon, Ezgi Aytürk, Yusuke Shono
article en
2 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Psychological AssessmentVol. 36(12)
Koç University (TR), Claremont Graduate University (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
1.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.