Inflation Disagreement Weakens the Power of Monetary Policy

We present empirical evidence that household inflation disagreement weakens the power of forward guidance and conventional monetary policy shocks. The attenuation effect is stronger when inflation forecasts are positively skewed and it is not driven by endogenous responses of inflation disagreement to contemporaneous shocks. These empirical observations can be rationalized by a model featuring heterogeneous beliefs about the central banks' inflation target. An agent who perceives higher future inflation also perceives a lower real interest rate and thus borrows more to finance consumption, subject to borrowing constraints. Higher inflation disagreement would lead to a larger share of borrowing-constrained agents, resulting in more sluggish responses of aggregate consumption to changes in current and expected future interest rates. This mechanism also provides a microeconomic foundation for Euler equation discounting that helps resolve the forward guidance puzzle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Finance and Economics Discussion Series
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17016/feds.2024.094
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inflation Disagreement Weakens the Power of Monetary Policy

Min Wei, Ding Dong, Pengfei Wang, Zheng Liu
2 citations
Finance and Economics Discussion Series
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
1.08
article

Inflation Disagreement Weakens the Power of Monetary Policy

Min Wei, Ding Dong, Pengfei Wang, Zheng Liu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We present empirical evidence that household inflation disagreement weakens the power of forward guidance and conventional monetary policy shocks. The attenuation effect is stronger when inflation forecasts are positively skewed and it is not driven by endogenous responses of inflation disagreement to contemporaneous shocks. These empirical observations can be rationalized by a model featuring heterogeneous beliefs about the central banks' inflation target. An agent who perceives higher future inflation also perceives a lower real interest rate and thus borrows more to finance consumption, subject to borrowing constraints. Higher inflation disagreement would lead to a larger share of borrowing-constrained agents, resulting in more sluggish responses of aggregate consumption to changes in current and expected future interest rates. This mechanism also provides a microeconomic foundation for Euler equation discounting that helps resolve the forward guidance puzzle.

Finance and Economics Discussion Series(2024-094)
Federal Reserve (US), Hong Kong Baptist University (HK), Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (US), Peking University (CN), HSBC Holdings (GB), Federal Reserve Board of Governors (US)
National Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.