Palliative Care and Intensivists’ Different Perspectives on Specialist Palliative Care Engagement in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Care

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> There is limited understanding of critical care (CC) and specialist palliative care (SPC) professionals' perceptions regarding the role and utility of SPC for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An 18-item survey was distributed via convenience sampling and snowballing strategies to CC and SPC attendings working with veno-venous ECMO patients. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 75 surveys were completed. Many CC professionals indicated that SPC consultation was not routinely helpful (5% vs. 71%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Responses varied on the appropriateness of discussing SPC with patients/families prognosis (81% SPC vs. 47% CC, <i>p</i> < 0.05), end-of-life preferences (100% vs. 62%, <i>p</i> < 0.05), goals of care (95% vs. 58%, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and code status (76% vs. 43%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Most respondents indicated that psychosocial support and multidisciplinary team collaborations were within the SPC scope. CC professionals were less likely to indicate that discussion of the care trajectory with patients/families was within SPC scope.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0231
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Palliative Care and Intensivists’ Different Perspectives on Specialist Palliative Care Engagement in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Care

Astrid Grouls, Bindu H. Akkanti, Elizabeth Kvale, Yangseon Park
1 links
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Palliative Care and Intensivists’ Different Perspectives on Specialist Palliative Care Engagement in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Care

Astrid Grouls, Bindu H. Akkanti, Elizabeth Kvale, Yangseon Park
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> There is limited understanding of critical care (CC) and specialist palliative care (SPC) professionals' perceptions regarding the role and utility of SPC for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An 18-item survey was distributed via convenience sampling and snowballing strategies to CC and SPC attendings working with veno-venous ECMO patients. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 75 surveys were completed. Many CC professionals indicated that SPC consultation was not routinely helpful (5% vs. 71%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Responses varied on the appropriateness of discussing SPC with patients/families prognosis (81% SPC vs. 47% CC, <i>p</i> < 0.05), end-of-life preferences (100% vs. 62%, <i>p</i> < 0.05), goals of care (95% vs. 58%, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and code status (76% vs. 43%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Most respondents indicated that psychosocial support and multidisciplinary team collaborations were within the SPC scope. CC professionals were less likely to indicate that discussion of the care trajectory with patients/families was within SPC scope.

Journal of Palliative MedicineVol. 28(2)
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.