Trends and Challenges in Mixed Methods Educational Research

The mixed methods research approach combines quantitative and qualitative methodologies to comprehensively understand complex research questions, particularly valuable in educational studies. This study critically examines adopting and utilizing mixed methods in Chinese educational research by analyzing 105 empirical studies published in major Chinese academic databases from 2002 to 2023. Using a framework based on established mixed-methods criteria, researchers evaluated these studies across five dimensions: research objectives, rationale for mixed methods, methodology and sample size, design type, and journal category. The findings reveal that while mixed methods usage in Chinese educational research has grown significantly since 2018, especially with a preference for explanatory sequential and concurrent designs, many studies lack clarity in articulating the rationale behind their methodological choices. This lack of transparency limits the potential of mixed methods to address educational challenges in depth. Additionally, data collection methods remain limited, relying on questionnaires and interviews and less frequently using techniques such as observations and experiments. High-quality journals show a preference for rigorously conducted mixed-methods research, underscoring the importance of methodological rigor. This study advocates for improved alignment of research questions, clearer rationale, and diversified data collection to enhance methodological robustness in future mixed methods educational studies in China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Asian Education
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v5i4.450
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends and Challenges in Mixed Methods Educational Research

Xiantong Zhao, Renyuan Xu
1 citations
International Journal of Asian Education
Online Learning and Analytics
0.41
article

Trends and Challenges in Mixed Methods Educational Research

Xiantong Zhao, Renyuan Xu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The mixed methods research approach combines quantitative and qualitative methodologies to comprehensively understand complex research questions, particularly valuable in educational studies. This study critically examines adopting and utilizing mixed methods in Chinese educational research by analyzing 105 empirical studies published in major Chinese academic databases from 2002 to 2023. Using a framework based on established mixed-methods criteria, researchers evaluated these studies across five dimensions: research objectives, rationale for mixed methods, methodology and sample size, design type, and journal category. The findings reveal that while mixed methods usage in Chinese educational research has grown significantly since 2018, especially with a preference for explanatory sequential and concurrent designs, many studies lack clarity in articulating the rationale behind their methodological choices. This lack of transparency limits the potential of mixed methods to address educational challenges in depth. Additionally, data collection methods remain limited, relying on questionnaires and interviews and less frequently using techniques such as observations and experiments. High-quality journals show a preference for rigorously conducted mixed-methods research, underscoring the importance of methodological rigor. This study advocates for improved alignment of research questions, clearer rationale, and diversified data collection to enhance methodological robustness in future mixed methods educational studies in China.

International Journal of Asian EducationVol. 5(4)
Southwest University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Online Learning and Analytics
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.