Heterogeneity and macroeconomic state dependence in the spending response to stimulus

We explore how households’ stimulus spending varies by income under different macroeconomic conditions over 2020–2021. We document a shift in the spending distribution from a declining pattern with a high average spending response to a U-shaped one with weaker responses and spending rising with income over much of the distribution. We argue that during crisis times like 2020, binding liquidity constraints render poorer households anxious to consume, while in more normalized economies (2021), they prioritize saving or servicing debts. • US households responded very differently to fiscal stimulus in 2021 vs. 2020. • In 2021, higher income households tended to spend more out of government stimulus. • In 2021, there was a U-shape with respect to income in the spending distribution. • In 2020, the stimulus spending distribution was consistent with standard theory. • A simple model of expenditure necessities explains the 2020/2021 differential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Letters
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.112117
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterogeneity and macroeconomic state dependence in the spending response to stimulus

Kieran James Walsh, Woongchan Jeon
2 citations
Economics Letters
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
0.83
article

Heterogeneity and macroeconomic state dependence in the spending response to stimulus

Kieran James Walsh, Woongchan Jeon
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We explore how households’ stimulus spending varies by income under different macroeconomic conditions over 2020–2021. We document a shift in the spending distribution from a declining pattern with a high average spending response to a U-shaped one with weaker responses and spending rising with income over much of the distribution. We argue that during crisis times like 2020, binding liquidity constraints render poorer households anxious to consume, while in more normalized economies (2021), they prioritize saving or servicing debts. • US households responded very differently to fiscal stimulus in 2021 vs. 2020. • In 2021, higher income households tended to spend more out of government stimulus. • In 2021, there was a U-shape with respect to income in the spending distribution. • In 2020, the stimulus spending distribution was consistent with standard theory. • A simple model of expenditure necessities explains the 2020/2021 differential.

Economics LettersVol. 247
ETH Zurich (CH)
University of California, Santa Barbara, Office of the President, University of California
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
0.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.