From feather pecking to immunity: Immune differences between lines selected for high and low feather pecking

Feather pecking (FP) is a serious behavioral disorder in laying hens, leading to feather damage, skin lesions, and often resulting in cannibalism. The mechanisms underlying FP are not clear yet, but recently the role of the immune system as a cause has been discussed. In humans, the interrelation between personality traits and the immune system is well-documented, with impulsivity and hyperactivity linked to distinct alterations in blood immune cell numbers and to elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Similarly, FP in hens is associated with impulsivity and hyperactivity, suggesting a possible connection between FP and immune cell alterations. In this study numbers of leukocyte subsets in blood, spleen and cecal tonsils, along with mitogen-induced lymphocyte proliferative response and antibody concentrations across hens selectively bred for high (HFP) and low (LFP) feather pecking behavior were analyzed. Results showed that divergent selection altered FP behavior, with HFP hens showing about 10 times more pecking behavior than hens of the LFP line. HFP hens had lower numbers of T helper cells, CD4+ CD25<sup>high</sup> as well as B cells compared to LFP hens. Furthermore, HFP hens demonstrated a stronger proliferation of T cells when stimulated with ConA, while showed a weaker response in T cell-dependent B cell proliferation when stimulated with PWM, compared to LFP hens. Antibody plasma concentrations were similar between both lines. These findings highlight substantial immunological differences between HFP and LFP hens, especially in T cell immunity, and support the hypothesis that FP may be an immune-related behavioral response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Behavior and Immunity
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2024.12.009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Stress Responses and Cortisol
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From feather pecking to immunity: Immune differences between lines selected for high and low feather pecking

Volker Stefanski, W. Bessei, Tanja Hofmann, Sonja Schmucker
2 citations
Brain Behavior and Immunity
Stress Responses and Cortisol
0.58
article

From feather pecking to immunity: Immune differences between lines selected for high and low feather pecking

Volker Stefanski, W. Bessei, Tanja Hofmann, Sonja Schmucker
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Feather pecking (FP) is a serious behavioral disorder in laying hens, leading to feather damage, skin lesions, and often resulting in cannibalism. The mechanisms underlying FP are not clear yet, but recently the role of the immune system as a cause has been discussed. In humans, the interrelation between personality traits and the immune system is well-documented, with impulsivity and hyperactivity linked to distinct alterations in blood immune cell numbers and to elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Similarly, FP in hens is associated with impulsivity and hyperactivity, suggesting a possible connection between FP and immune cell alterations. In this study numbers of leukocyte subsets in blood, spleen and cecal tonsils, along with mitogen-induced lymphocyte proliferative response and antibody concentrations across hens selectively bred for high (HFP) and low (LFP) feather pecking behavior were analyzed. Results showed that divergent selection altered FP behavior, with HFP hens showing about 10 times more pecking behavior than hens of the LFP line. HFP hens had lower numbers of T helper cells, CD4+ CD25<sup>high</sup> as well as B cells compared to LFP hens. Furthermore, HFP hens demonstrated a stronger proliferation of T cells when stimulated with ConA, while showed a weaker response in T cell-dependent B cell proliferation when stimulated with PWM, compared to LFP hens. Antibody plasma concentrations were similar between both lines. These findings highlight substantial immunological differences between HFP and LFP hens, especially in T cell immunity, and support the hypothesis that FP may be an immune-related behavioral response.

Brain Behavior and ImmunityVol. 124
University of Hohenheim (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Stress Responses and Cortisol
0.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.