Patents, gendered bodies and innovation: a case study on contraceptives

Abstract The Anthropocene, while a recently popularized term, is part of a long history theorizing human impact globally. Since the 1970s, a chief focus of modulating this impact was population control. While the Anthropocene is about the human impact on the Earth, to date, the contraceptive burden lies with women, using invasive technologies that can have highly detrimental side effects. This article uses patent records to consider the sources of this disparity, including how post-grant patent law theories based on incentives to innovate ignore gender narratives and the varying ways in which society evaluates different bodies, and how this has different consequences for invention and innovation. As we are not yet in a post-gender world, it is important that our post-grant patent theory considers gender. This is necessary if we are to meet the challenges that face all of humankind.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpae096
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patents, gendered bodies and innovation: a case study on contraceptives

Jessica C. Lai
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

Patents, gendered bodies and innovation: a case study on contraceptives

Jessica C. Lai
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Anthropocene, while a recently popularized term, is part of a long history theorizing human impact globally. Since the 1970s, a chief focus of modulating this impact was population control. While the Anthropocene is about the human impact on the Earth, to date, the contraceptive burden lies with women, using invasive technologies that can have highly detrimental side effects. This article uses patent records to consider the sources of this disparity, including how post-grant patent law theories based on incentives to innovate ignore gender narratives and the varying ways in which society evaluates different bodies, and how this has different consequences for invention and innovation. As we are not yet in a post-gender world, it is important that our post-grant patent theory considers gender. This is necessary if we are to meet the challenges that face all of humankind.

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & PracticeVol. 20(1)
Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law (AM)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.