Digital strategies intervention and impact in promoting health education and making health decisions among individuals

Objectives : To assess the influence of digital strategies on individual behaviour, considerations, and decisions regarding health issues. To evaluate the impact of digital advertisements on the decision to receive vaccines, take the COVID-19 vaccination as a case report. Methodology : A structured 5-axes questionnaire was distributed through a Google form and completed by 351 participants. The investigated variables were information, “discomfort, anxiety, and fear,” motivation, reference groups, and the decision to take the vaccine. The reliability analysis was carried out to assess the internal consistency of the study elements. Multicollinearity and multiple regression analyses were utilized to evaluate the research hypothesis. Results : A positive correlation and robust internal consistency between the variables were confirmed. The overall Cronbach’s alpha (α) is 0.93, indicating a solid association between the variables and the consistency of the measuring scale. The information, emotion, motivation, and reference group have a moderate level of importance with average mean values of 3.61, 3.74, 3.55, and 3.88, respectively. The correlation of the decision to take the vaccine with the information and the emotion variables was the highest (Pearson’s correlation of 0.675 and 0.676, respectively). The motivation and reference groups showed lower associations (Pearson’s correlation of 0.558 and 0.496). The results of the multiple linear regression analysis (α ≤ 0.05) confirm the hypothesis by demonstrating that the independent variables significantly influenced the decision to take the vaccine. The F-value (98.26) and significance level (p < 0.00) provide further validation of the model. Conclusion : Information and emotional concerns significantly impact health decision-making, while motivation and reference groups have a considerable role. It is a warranty of expanding digital strategies to improve health literacy and equity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmacia
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.71.e136398
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital strategies intervention and impact in promoting health education and making health decisions among individuals

Ali Mahmoud Al-Samydai, Rudaina Othman Yousif, Mahmood Jasim Alsamydai, Raed Shudifat et al.
4 citations
Pharmacia
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.53
article

Digital strategies intervention and impact in promoting health education and making health decisions among individuals

Ali Mahmoud Al-Samydai, Rudaina Othman Yousif, Mahmood Jasim Alsamydai, Raed Shudifat, Lidia Kamal Al‐Halaseh, Sewar G. Shnaikat, Toqa Abu Aboud, Abdulazeez Alzuhairi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Objectives : To assess the influence of digital strategies on individual behaviour, considerations, and decisions regarding health issues. To evaluate the impact of digital advertisements on the decision to receive vaccines, take the COVID-19 vaccination as a case report. Methodology : A structured 5-axes questionnaire was distributed through a Google form and completed by 351 participants. The investigated variables were information, “discomfort, anxiety, and fear,” motivation, reference groups, and the decision to take the vaccine. The reliability analysis was carried out to assess the internal consistency of the study elements. Multicollinearity and multiple regression analyses were utilized to evaluate the research hypothesis. Results : A positive correlation and robust internal consistency between the variables were confirmed. The overall Cronbach’s alpha (α) is 0.93, indicating a solid association between the variables and the consistency of the measuring scale. The information, emotion, motivation, and reference group have a moderate level of importance with average mean values of 3.61, 3.74, 3.55, and 3.88, respectively. The correlation of the decision to take the vaccine with the information and the emotion variables was the highest (Pearson’s correlation of 0.675 and 0.676, respectively). The motivation and reference groups showed lower associations (Pearson’s correlation of 0.558 and 0.496). The results of the multiple linear regression analysis (α ≤ 0.05) confirm the hypothesis by demonstrating that the independent variables significantly influenced the decision to take the vaccine. The F-value (98.26) and significance level (p < 0.00) provide further validation of the model. Conclusion : Information and emotional concerns significantly impact health decision-making, while motivation and reference groups have a considerable role. It is a warranty of expanding digital strategies to improve health literacy and equity.

PharmaciaVol. 71
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.