Comparative analysis of real-clinical MRI and BraTS datasets for brain tumor segmentation

This study compares the BraTS 2020 dataset with a Real-Clinical dataset from Ankara Bilkent City Hospital for brain tumor segmentation. We analyzed histogram attributes and image dimensions, revealing that the Real-Clinical dataset has a more diverse and skewed intensity distribution compared to the uniformity of the BraTS dataset. This inconsistency suggests potential challenges for algorithms trained on BraTS data when applied in clinical settings, which exhibit greater image variation. Additionally, the higher resolution and inclusion of the entire skull in the clinical dataset complicate processing and segmentation, necessitating more robust algorithms. Our research underscores the importance of developing advanced machine-learning tools that can handle the complexity and variability of clinical MRI scans, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and clinical applicability. This study lays the groundwork for improving medical imaging algorithms to ensure their effectiveness in real-world clinical environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IET conference proceedings.
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2024.3274
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of real-clinical MRI and BraTS datasets for brain tumor segmentation

Martin Crane, Ramin Ranjbarzadeh, Malika Bendechache, Ayşe Keleş
14 citations
IET conference proceedings.
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
3.46
article

Comparative analysis of real-clinical MRI and BraTS datasets for brain tumor segmentation

Martin Crane, Ramin Ranjbarzadeh, Malika Bendechache, Ayşe Keleş
article en
14 citations

Abstract

This study compares the BraTS 2020 dataset with a Real-Clinical dataset from Ankara Bilkent City Hospital for brain tumor segmentation. We analyzed histogram attributes and image dimensions, revealing that the Real-Clinical dataset has a more diverse and skewed intensity distribution compared to the uniformity of the BraTS dataset. This inconsistency suggests potential challenges for algorithms trained on BraTS data when applied in clinical settings, which exhibit greater image variation. Additionally, the higher resolution and inclusion of the entire skull in the clinical dataset complicate processing and segmentation, necessitating more robust algorithms. Our research underscores the importance of developing advanced machine-learning tools that can handle the complexity and variability of clinical MRI scans, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and clinical applicability. This study lays the groundwork for improving medical imaging algorithms to ensure their effectiveness in real-world clinical environments.

IET conference proceedings.Vol. 2024(10)
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Istanbul Medipol University (TR), Dublin City University (IE), Ankara Medipol Üniversitesi
Science Foundation Ireland
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
3.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative analysis of real-clinical MRI and BraTS datasets for brain tumor segmentation — Martin Crane, Ramin Ranjbarzadeh, et al. · IET conference proceedings. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS