Addressing the use of generative AI in academic writing

The rise of generative AI has been a major disruptive force in academia. Academics are concerned about its impact on student learning. Students can use generative AI technologies, such as ChatGPT, to complete many academic tasks on their behalf. This could lead to poor academic outcomes as students use ChatGPT to complete assessments, rather than engaging with the learning material. One particularly vulnerable academic activity is academic writing. This paper reports the results of an active learning intervention where ChatGPT was used by students to write an academic paper. The resultant papers were then analysed and critiqued by students to highlight the weaknesses of such AI-produced papers. The research used the Technology Acceptance Model to measure changing student perceptions about the usefulness and ease of use of ChatGPT in the creation of academic text. A statistical analysis indicates the intervention's impact on their behavioural intentions on using ChatGPT for academic writing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100342
Citations
40
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing the use of generative AI in academic writing

Johan van Niekerk, Iain Sutherland, Petrus M.J. Delport
40 citations
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
4.81
article

Addressing the use of generative AI in academic writing

Johan van Niekerk, Iain Sutherland, Petrus M.J. Delport
article en
40 citations

Abstract

The rise of generative AI has been a major disruptive force in academia. Academics are concerned about its impact on student learning. Students can use generative AI technologies, such as ChatGPT, to complete many academic tasks on their behalf. This could lead to poor academic outcomes as students use ChatGPT to complete assessments, rather than engaging with the learning material. One particularly vulnerable academic activity is academic writing. This paper reports the results of an active learning intervention where ChatGPT was used by students to write an academic paper. The resultant papers were then analysed and critiqued by students to highlight the weaknesses of such AI-produced papers. The research used the Technology Acceptance Model to measure changing student perceptions about the usefulness and ease of use of ChatGPT in the creation of academic text. A statistical analysis indicates the intervention's impact on their behavioural intentions on using ChatGPT for academic writing.

Computers and Education Artificial IntelligenceVol. 8
Agder Research (NO), Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
4.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Addressing the use of generative AI in academic writing — Johan van Niekerk, Iain Sutherland, et al. · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS