Recycled cross-laminated timber as a low environmental impact alternative to virgin material: Latvia case study

Building with wood has become more popular and so has the circularity concept and carbon storage in products. This study aims to analyse the life cycle impacts of cross-laminated timber (CLT) recycling. Functional unit of 1 m 3 was chosen for the CLT and recycled cross-laminated timber (ReCLT) comparison. For the life cycle assessment, the ReCiPe methodology was used allowing to calculate midpoint and endpoint accumulated impacts of both ReCLT and CLT, therefore allowing for the best comparison. Overall, the ReCLT showed significantly reduced environmental impacts in endpoint categories from 50 % to 80 % reduction in the single score evaluation. Although midpoint impacts showed mostly reduced environmental impacts, e.g., global warming, land use and others, the water eutrophication – both marine and freshwater, leading to think for improvements in the recycling process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e04094
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Wood Treatment and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recycled cross-laminated timber as a low environmental impact alternative to virgin material: Latvia case study

Terēza Bezručko, Megija Valtere, Dagnija Blumberga, Ilze Vamža et al.
3 citations
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Wood Treatment and Properties
0.80
article

Recycled cross-laminated timber as a low environmental impact alternative to virgin material: Latvia case study

Terēza Bezručko, Megija Valtere, Dagnija Blumberga, Ilze Vamža, Peteris Vasuks
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Building with wood has become more popular and so has the circularity concept and carbon storage in products. This study aims to analyse the life cycle impacts of cross-laminated timber (CLT) recycling. Functional unit of 1 m 3 was chosen for the CLT and recycled cross-laminated timber (ReCLT) comparison. For the life cycle assessment, the ReCiPe methodology was used allowing to calculate midpoint and endpoint accumulated impacts of both ReCLT and CLT, therefore allowing for the best comparison. Overall, the ReCLT showed significantly reduced environmental impacts in endpoint categories from 50 % to 80 % reduction in the single score evaluation. Although midpoint impacts showed mostly reduced environmental impacts, e.g., global warming, land use and others, the water eutrophication – both marine and freshwater, leading to think for improvements in the recycling process.

Case Studies in Construction MaterialsVol. 22
Riga Technical University (LV), Latvian Maritime Academy (LV)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Wood Treatment and Properties
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.