Resource allocation in multi-layer, continuous defense, security games versus strategic attackers

When defending soft targets, such as airports, subway stations, sports venues and houses of worship, it is critical to optimally allocate defensive resources across the different security layers of multiple targets. This allocation will effectively utilize human and monetary resources and reduce the risks from attacks. In this problem the objective of the defender is to optimally allocate resources across multiple targets throughout the respective security layers to decrease the expected damages, decrease the probability of a successful attack, and potentially deter the adversary from executing an attack plan on any target. The attacker aims to circumvent the security measures by adaptively allocating resources across the different targets and layers. This paper expands on past resource allocation problems by demonstrating the extension of conclusions drawn of single layer security systems to multi-layer cases when defending soft targets against adversarial threats. Through the results of this paper, we find that conclusions drawn from solving a 1-Layer resource allocation security game can be applied to a similar N − Layer game due to the way attackers are deterred in our game model. In addition, we find that several variables are interchangeable in our equilibrium solutions, meaning that it can be just as effective for the defender to adjust the value of their targets as it would be for them to adjust the inherent defense, which can be helpful in aiding the defender’s decision making process if they cannot or choose not to make changes to certain variables.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk sciences.
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.risk.2024.100010
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resource allocation in multi-layer, continuous defense, security games versus strategic attackers

Jun Zhuang, Ian Unson
2 citations
Risk sciences.
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
0.52
article

Resource allocation in multi-layer, continuous defense, security games versus strategic attackers

Jun Zhuang, Ian Unson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

When defending soft targets, such as airports, subway stations, sports venues and houses of worship, it is critical to optimally allocate defensive resources across the different security layers of multiple targets. This allocation will effectively utilize human and monetary resources and reduce the risks from attacks. In this problem the objective of the defender is to optimally allocate resources across multiple targets throughout the respective security layers to decrease the expected damages, decrease the probability of a successful attack, and potentially deter the adversary from executing an attack plan on any target. The attacker aims to circumvent the security measures by adaptively allocating resources across the different targets and layers. This paper expands on past resource allocation problems by demonstrating the extension of conclusions drawn of single layer security systems to multi-layer cases when defending soft targets against adversarial threats. Through the results of this paper, we find that conclusions drawn from solving a 1-Layer resource allocation security game can be applied to a similar N − Layer game due to the way attackers are deterred in our game model. In addition, we find that several variables are interchangeable in our equilibrium solutions, meaning that it can be just as effective for the defender to adjust the value of their targets as it would be for them to adjust the inherent defense, which can be helpful in aiding the defender’s decision making process if they cannot or choose not to make changes to certain variables.

Risk sciences.Vol. 1
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.