How do landowners perceive and respond to incentives for sustainable forest management? A synthesis to inform discussions on programs for climate-smart forestry

Originally, forest sustainability was primarily concerned with continual timber production. Contemporary concepts such as sustainable forest management (SFM) and climate-smart forestry (CSF) emphasize the continual production of multiple forest goods and services, both market and non-market. In addition to the creation of new programs for CSF, recent legislation in the United States (US) has expanded the use of incentive programs traditionally used for subsidizing SFM to also support management activities that aid in climate adaptation and mitigation. Understanding landowner perceptions of incentive programs for SFM in the US and how their use correlates with landowner behavior may be informative for discussions on programs for CSF. In this study, we systematically review the literature on financial incentive programs for SFM and forest landowner behavior, perceptions, and characteristics. We restrict our analysis to refereed articles published in academic journals since 1992 and which feature actual incentive programs available to forest landowners in the US. We synthesize lessons from the literature on past and current programs and discuss potential implications for incentive programs for CSF. Program administrators may utilize the findings from this review to inform the design and administration of incentive programs that promote sustainable forestry and support forest landowners in responding to and mitigating climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trees Forests and People
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100753
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do landowners perceive and respond to incentives for sustainable forest management? A synthesis to inform discussions on programs for climate-smart forestry

Stephanie Chizmar, Srijana Baral, Tamara Cushing, Tatyana B. Ruseva
7 citations
Trees Forests and People
Forest Management and Policy
1.98
article

How do landowners perceive and respond to incentives for sustainable forest management? A synthesis to inform discussions on programs for climate-smart forestry

Stephanie Chizmar, Srijana Baral, Tamara Cushing, Tatyana B. Ruseva
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Originally, forest sustainability was primarily concerned with continual timber production. Contemporary concepts such as sustainable forest management (SFM) and climate-smart forestry (CSF) emphasize the continual production of multiple forest goods and services, both market and non-market. In addition to the creation of new programs for CSF, recent legislation in the United States (US) has expanded the use of incentive programs traditionally used for subsidizing SFM to also support management activities that aid in climate adaptation and mitigation. Understanding landowner perceptions of incentive programs for SFM in the US and how their use correlates with landowner behavior may be informative for discussions on programs for CSF. In this study, we systematically review the literature on financial incentive programs for SFM and forest landowner behavior, perceptions, and characteristics. We restrict our analysis to refereed articles published in academic journals since 1992 and which feature actual incentive programs available to forest landowners in the US. We synthesize lessons from the literature on past and current programs and discuss potential implications for incentive programs for CSF. Program administrators may utilize the findings from this review to inform the design and administration of incentive programs that promote sustainable forestry and support forest landowners in responding to and mitigating climate change.

Trees Forests and PeopleVol. 19
University of Florida (US), Southern Research Station (US), Appalachian State University (US), Colorado State University (US)
U.S. Forest Service
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Forest Management and Policy
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.