DRIVELINE INFECTION IN TWO CONTEMPORARY LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES: A SINGLE CENTER RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

Background and Aim: Driveline infection (DLI) are common adverse events in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) leading to severe complications and re-admissions. Methods: The study aims to characterize risk factors for DLI at 6 months postimplant. This single-center analysis included 137 LVAD consecutive patients (n=76 HeartMate3 [HM3], n=61 HeartWare [HVAD]; male 84.7%, mean age 59.4±8.7) implanted between 2010 and 2024. Demographics, clinical parameters, surgical strategies and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Results: At 6 months of LVAD support, 6.6% of patients were readmitted for DLI, 19% experienced DLI but were treated in the outpatient setting, and 74.4% had no DLI. Among DLI patients cohort at 6 months, the analysis showed an increased rate of pre-operative bloodstream infection (mostly Gram+ Cocci; 15.6% vs. 6.7% of no-DLI cohort, respectively, p=0.003), diabetes (28.1% vs. 20.2%, p=0.038), high BMI (25.8 vs. 23.8, p=0.05) and previous cardiac surgery (18.8 vs 11.5%, p=0.045). DLI occurred more frequently in the case of ‘-shape driveline tunnelling’ technique. HM3 patients showed less rate of DLI if ‘direct driveline tunnelling’ technique was adopted. Conclusions: DLI remains a delicate issue to address in LVAD recipients. Pre-operative risk factors should be properly weighted. ‘Direct tunnelling’ technique for driveline placement may represent a protective factor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2459/01.jcm.0001096308.59867.a7
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DRIVELINE INFECTION IN TWO CONTEMPORARY LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES: A SINGLE CENTER RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

Massimo Boffini, G. Galanti, V. Aloi, A. Loforte et al.
1 links
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

DRIVELINE INFECTION IN TWO CONTEMPORARY LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES: A SINGLE CENTER RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

Massimo Boffini, G. Galanti, V. Aloi, A. Loforte, Antonio Spitaleri, Barbara Parrella, G. Gallone, Matteo Marro, P. Abbà, Giuseppina Monteleone, Mauro Rinaldi, A. Sandoval
article en

Abstract

Background and Aim: Driveline infection (DLI) are common adverse events in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) leading to severe complications and re-admissions. Methods: The study aims to characterize risk factors for DLI at 6 months postimplant. This single-center analysis included 137 LVAD consecutive patients (n=76 HeartMate3 [HM3], n=61 HeartWare [HVAD]; male 84.7%, mean age 59.4±8.7) implanted between 2010 and 2024. Demographics, clinical parameters, surgical strategies and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Results: At 6 months of LVAD support, 6.6% of patients were readmitted for DLI, 19% experienced DLI but were treated in the outpatient setting, and 74.4% had no DLI. Among DLI patients cohort at 6 months, the analysis showed an increased rate of pre-operative bloodstream infection (mostly Gram+ Cocci; 15.6% vs. 6.7% of no-DLI cohort, respectively, p=0.003), diabetes (28.1% vs. 20.2%, p=0.038), high BMI (25.8 vs. 23.8, p=0.05) and previous cardiac surgery (18.8 vs 11.5%, p=0.045). DLI occurred more frequently in the case of ‘-shape driveline tunnelling’ technique. HM3 patients showed less rate of DLI if ‘direct driveline tunnelling’ technique was adopted. Conclusions: DLI remains a delicate issue to address in LVAD recipients. Pre-operative risk factors should be properly weighted. ‘Direct tunnelling’ technique for driveline placement may represent a protective factor.

Journal of Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 25(Supplement 1Supplement 1)
Favaloro Foundation (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.