The Prevalence of Alveolar Ridge Defects According to Seibert's Classification: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background and objective Alveolar ridge defects in partially edentulous patients present significant challenges in prosthodontic treatment planning. Seibert's classification system provides a structured approach to categorizing these defects based on the buccolingual and apico-coronal dimensions of the ridge. Accurate classification is crucial for determining appropriate treatment strategies for implant placement, fixed prosthesis, or tissue augmentation. Hence, this study aimed to assess and classify tissue defects in partially edentulous ridges based on Seibert's classification Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted to measure and classify alveolar ridge defects in partially edentulous patients by using Seibert's classification system. Patients aged 18 years and above with partially edentulous ridges requiring prosthodontic treatment were considered for inclusion. Individuals with systemic conditions affecting healing, completely edentulous patients, and those with active periodontal infections were excluded. Impressions of dental arches were obtained, and the alveolar ridge dimensions were measured using digital calipers. Results The study included 122 participants, with a slight male predominance (n=65, 53.3%). The classification of alveolar ridge defects revealed that 71 (58.2%) were Class III, 33 (27.0%) were Class I, and 18 (14.8%) were Class II. A chi-square analysis indicated no significant association between sex and the classification of alveolar ridge defects (p=0.410). Conclusions The prevalence of Class III alveolar ridge defects highlights the need for tailored treatment approaches in prosthetic rehabilitation. While gender differences were observed, they did not significantly influence defect classification. Future research should investigate additional demographic factors to enhance understanding and improve treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.75602
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Prevalence of Alveolar Ridge Defects According to Seibert's Classification: A Cross-Sectional Study

Vidyashree Nandini, Mohamed Farith N, Kalyani Ramkumar Sadhana
3 citations
Cureus
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
1.48
article

The Prevalence of Alveolar Ridge Defects According to Seibert's Classification: A Cross-Sectional Study

Vidyashree Nandini, Mohamed Farith N, Kalyani Ramkumar Sadhana
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Background and objective Alveolar ridge defects in partially edentulous patients present significant challenges in prosthodontic treatment planning. Seibert's classification system provides a structured approach to categorizing these defects based on the buccolingual and apico-coronal dimensions of the ridge. Accurate classification is crucial for determining appropriate treatment strategies for implant placement, fixed prosthesis, or tissue augmentation. Hence, this study aimed to assess and classify tissue defects in partially edentulous ridges based on Seibert's classification Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted to measure and classify alveolar ridge defects in partially edentulous patients by using Seibert's classification system. Patients aged 18 years and above with partially edentulous ridges requiring prosthodontic treatment were considered for inclusion. Individuals with systemic conditions affecting healing, completely edentulous patients, and those with active periodontal infections were excluded. Impressions of dental arches were obtained, and the alveolar ridge dimensions were measured using digital calipers. Results The study included 122 participants, with a slight male predominance (n=65, 53.3%). The classification of alveolar ridge defects revealed that 71 (58.2%) were Class III, 33 (27.0%) were Class I, and 18 (14.8%) were Class II. A chi-square analysis indicated no significant association between sex and the classification of alveolar ridge defects (p=0.410). Conclusions The prevalence of Class III alveolar ridge defects highlights the need for tailored treatment approaches in prosthetic rehabilitation. While gender differences were observed, they did not significantly influence defect classification. Future research should investigate additional demographic factors to enhance understanding and improve treatment strategies.

CureusVol. 16(12)
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN), SRM Dental College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
1.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Prevalence of Alveolar Ridge Defects According to Seibert's Classification: A Cross-Sectional Study — Vidyashree Nandini, Mohamed Farith N, et al. · Cureus (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS