Oncological Outcomes From Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is effective for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) at increasing overall survival (OS) compared to systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) alone. The addition of Oxaliplatin heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown in a randomized controlled trial to result in increased complications without significant OS benefit. This study evaluates outcomes for CRPM patients undergoing CRS+HIPEC with Oxaliplatin (Ox) 368mg/m<sup>2</sup> (30 min), versus Mitomycin C (MMC) 35mg/m<sup>2</sup> (90min). METHODS: A prospective CRPM real-world database was used to collect outcomes for patients undergoing CRS+HIPEC at a single center. OS, recurrence-free (RFS), peritoneal RFS (PeRFS) were compared amongst all patients with histologically proven CRPM, those with completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score =0/1, and those with CC score=0/1 who were SACT naïve. RESULTS: Between April 2005 and April 2021, 409 patients underwent CRS+HIPEC: 271 (66%) had MMC, 138 (34%) Ox. Of these, 395 (97%) had histologically confirmed CRPM, 336 (85%) achieved CC=0/1, 188 (47%) were SACT naïve; median OS =39.5, 44.4, and 47.2 months respectively. MMC versus Ox median OS in CC0/1=43.7 (95% CI 35.9-48.3) versus 50.1 (39.7-70.2) months, P = .28; Median OS in SACT naïve=45.7 (39.4-65.9) versus 59.9 (38.3-82.0) months, P = .31; multivariable analysis for CC0/1, SACT naïve patients showed Ox was comparable to MMC: HR=0.90, (0.64-1.27) P = .55 versus HR=0.88, (0.53-1.44) P = .60, respectively. Ox resulted in a significantly improved PeRFS in CC0/1 patients (MMC=9.0 versus Ox=12.6months, P = .01). A multivariable model for PeRFS showed a HR=0.63, (0.43-0.95), P = .03 for Ox. CONCLUSION: This study suggests a role for Ox HIPEC in CRPM which should be explored further in clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Colorectal Cancer
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2024.12.001
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oncological Outcomes From Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases

Mark Saunders, Andrew G. Renehan, Chelliah R. Selvasekar, F.E. Marti Marti et al.
2 citations
Clinical Colorectal Cancer
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
1.15
article

Oncological Outcomes From Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases

Mark Saunders, Andrew G. Renehan, Chelliah R. Selvasekar, F.E. Marti Marti, Omer Aziz, Raghavendar T. Nagaraju, Malcolm Wilson, Hamish Clouston, Michael Braun, Jorge Barriuso, Jonathan Wild, Konstantinos Kamposioras, Nadina Tinsley, Saifee Mullamitha, Sarah O’Dwyer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is effective for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) at increasing overall survival (OS) compared to systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) alone. The addition of Oxaliplatin heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown in a randomized controlled trial to result in increased complications without significant OS benefit. This study evaluates outcomes for CRPM patients undergoing CRS+HIPEC with Oxaliplatin (Ox) 368mg/m<sup>2</sup> (30 min), versus Mitomycin C (MMC) 35mg/m<sup>2</sup> (90min). METHODS: A prospective CRPM real-world database was used to collect outcomes for patients undergoing CRS+HIPEC at a single center. OS, recurrence-free (RFS), peritoneal RFS (PeRFS) were compared amongst all patients with histologically proven CRPM, those with completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score =0/1, and those with CC score=0/1 who were SACT naïve. RESULTS: Between April 2005 and April 2021, 409 patients underwent CRS+HIPEC: 271 (66%) had MMC, 138 (34%) Ox. Of these, 395 (97%) had histologically confirmed CRPM, 336 (85%) achieved CC=0/1, 188 (47%) were SACT naïve; median OS =39.5, 44.4, and 47.2 months respectively. MMC versus Ox median OS in CC0/1=43.7 (95% CI 35.9-48.3) versus 50.1 (39.7-70.2) months, P = .28; Median OS in SACT naïve=45.7 (39.4-65.9) versus 59.9 (38.3-82.0) months, P = .31; multivariable analysis for CC0/1, SACT naïve patients showed Ox was comparable to MMC: HR=0.90, (0.64-1.27) P = .55 versus HR=0.88, (0.53-1.44) P = .60, respectively. Ox resulted in a significantly improved PeRFS in CC0/1 patients (MMC=9.0 versus Ox=12.6months, P = .01). A multivariable model for PeRFS showed a HR=0.63, (0.43-0.95), P = .03 for Ox. CONCLUSION: This study suggests a role for Ox HIPEC in CRPM which should be explored further in clinical trials.

Clinical Colorectal CancerVol. 24(2)
University of Manchester (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute (GB), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Pfizer, Cancer Research UK, European Society for Medical Oncology, Servier, Ipsen
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.