Recycling engineering sediment waste as sustainable subgrade material using ground granulated blast-furnace slag, electrolytic manganese residue and cement

With the rapid utilization of underground space, a large amount of engineering sediment waste (ESW) is generated, causing serious environmental burden to cities. This study develops a ternary binder named GEC containing ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), electrolytic manganese residue (EMR), and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) to stabilize ESW as sustainable subgrade materials. Based on unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests, the optimum mix ratio of GEC was achieved. The durability and leaching toxicity of GEC-stabilized ESW (GESW) and OPC-stabilized ESW (CESW) was evaluated by conducting water immersion, sulfate attack and leaching tests. Furthermore, the micro-mechanisms affecting macro performance of GESW were clarified based on X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and thermogravimetric tests. The results show that the optimum mix ratio of GGBS: EMR: OPC inside GEC was 5:3:2, and 7- and 28-day UCS of GESW containing 10 % GEC exceeded 6 and 8 MPa, respectively. Under same stabilization strength level, using 5 % GEC can fully replace OPC, thus reducing binder and OPC dosages by 37.5 % and 87.5 %, respectively. GESW had better water and sulfate attack resistance than CESW, and it can be directly recycled into subgrade without environmental concerns. The C-S-H, C-A-H, and ettringite were mainly responsible for the strength and durability improvement of GESW and CESW. The interactions between GGBS, EMR, and OPC were analyzed and clarified. Replacing OPC with GEC for ESW stabilization can respectively reduce CO 2 emission and cost by 84.5 % and 67 %. The key findings provide a low-carbon approach of recycling ESW as sustainable subgrade materials. • The low-carbon binder GEC was developed using GGBS, EMR and OPC with optimum mass ratio of 5:3:2 for engineering sediment waste (ESW) stabilization. • The GEC-stabilized ESW (GESW) had better durability than OPC-stabilized ESW (CESW). • GESW can be directly recycled as subgrade material without environmental concerns. • Using GEC instead of OPC for ESW stabilization can respectively reduce 84.5 % CO 2 emission and 67 % cost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2024.103969
Citations
68
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recycling engineering sediment waste as sustainable subgrade material using ground granulated blast-furnace slag, electrolytic manganese residue and cement

Mingzheng Zhu, Lei Lang, Shaoyun Pu
68 citations
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
17.74
article

Recycling engineering sediment waste as sustainable subgrade material using ground granulated blast-furnace slag, electrolytic manganese residue and cement

Mingzheng Zhu, Lei Lang, Shaoyun Pu
article en
68 citations

Abstract

With the rapid utilization of underground space, a large amount of engineering sediment waste (ESW) is generated, causing serious environmental burden to cities. This study develops a ternary binder named GEC containing ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), electrolytic manganese residue (EMR), and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) to stabilize ESW as sustainable subgrade materials. Based on unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests, the optimum mix ratio of GEC was achieved. The durability and leaching toxicity of GEC-stabilized ESW (GESW) and OPC-stabilized ESW (CESW) was evaluated by conducting water immersion, sulfate attack and leaching tests. Furthermore, the micro-mechanisms affecting macro performance of GESW were clarified based on X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and thermogravimetric tests. The results show that the optimum mix ratio of GGBS: EMR: OPC inside GEC was 5:3:2, and 7- and 28-day UCS of GESW containing 10 % GEC exceeded 6 and 8 MPa, respectively. Under same stabilization strength level, using 5 % GEC can fully replace OPC, thus reducing binder and OPC dosages by 37.5 % and 87.5 %, respectively. GESW had better water and sulfate attack resistance than CESW, and it can be directly recycled into subgrade without environmental concerns. The C-S-H, C-A-H, and ettringite were mainly responsible for the strength and durability improvement of GESW and CESW. The interactions between GGBS, EMR, and OPC were analyzed and clarified. Replacing OPC with GEC for ESW stabilization can respectively reduce CO 2 emission and cost by 84.5 % and 67 %. The key findings provide a low-carbon approach of recycling ESW as sustainable subgrade materials. • The low-carbon binder GEC was developed using GGBS, EMR and OPC with optimum mass ratio of 5:3:2 for engineering sediment waste (ESW) stabilization. • The GEC-stabilized ESW (GESW) had better durability than OPC-stabilized ESW (CESW). • GESW can be directly recycled as subgrade material without environmental concerns. • Using GEC instead of OPC for ESW stabilization can respectively reduce 84.5 % CO 2 emission and 67 % cost.

Environmental Technology & InnovationVol. 37
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Yunnan University (CN), Shaoxing University (CN), Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
17.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.