Stack pressure on lithium-ion pouch cells: A comparative study of constant pressure and fixed displacement devices

This study addresses the effects of stack pressure on lithium-ion pouch cells by comparing different fixture designs and their impact on variation of stack pressure with time. While previous research has examined pouch cell performance under varying stack pressures, a comprehensive comparison of fixture types and their influence on pressure variation has been lacking. This research provides insights for researchers in selecting appropriate fixture designs for their specific investigations. Two categories of fixtures were investigated: constant pressure fixtures (utilizing springs and a passive pneumatic system) and fixed displacement fixtures (employing bolted plates). The experiments evaluated the pressure loss from an initial static pressure of 90 kPa over a 48h resting period, in addition to the pressure changes under dynamic load profiles. Our findings reveal that, under dynamic loading, the fixed displacement fixture exhibited a pressure variation five times higher than the constant pressure device using springs, and 3.7 higher than the pneumatic device. Additionally, the results demonstrated that the fixed displacement device is unable to mitigate the pressure loss due to relaxation effects of the cell and the bolted connections. In contrast, the spring-based fixture offered a simple and effective solution to hold pressure during experiments. • Stack pressure variation is significantly different among the fixtures tested. • Spring-based fixtures offer a robust solution to apply stack pressure. • Fixed displacement devices fail to mitigate cell relaxation effects. • Pneumatic devices are best explored with active pressure control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Power Sources
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.236019
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stack pressure on lithium-ion pouch cells: A comparative study of constant pressure and fixed displacement devices

Denise Morrey, Gordana Collier, Adriano Schommer, Paul Henshall et al.
10 citations
Journal of Power Sources
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
2.03
article

Stack pressure on lithium-ion pouch cells: A comparative study of constant pressure and fixed displacement devices

Denise Morrey, Gordana Collier, Adriano Schommer, Paul Henshall, Miguel Orozco Corzo
article en
10 citations

Abstract

This study addresses the effects of stack pressure on lithium-ion pouch cells by comparing different fixture designs and their impact on variation of stack pressure with time. While previous research has examined pouch cell performance under varying stack pressures, a comprehensive comparison of fixture types and their influence on pressure variation has been lacking. This research provides insights for researchers in selecting appropriate fixture designs for their specific investigations. Two categories of fixtures were investigated: constant pressure fixtures (utilizing springs and a passive pneumatic system) and fixed displacement fixtures (employing bolted plates). The experiments evaluated the pressure loss from an initial static pressure of 90 kPa over a 48h resting period, in addition to the pressure changes under dynamic load profiles. Our findings reveal that, under dynamic loading, the fixed displacement fixture exhibited a pressure variation five times higher than the constant pressure device using springs, and 3.7 higher than the pneumatic device. Additionally, the results demonstrated that the fixed displacement device is unable to mitigate the pressure loss due to relaxation effects of the cell and the bolted connections. In contrast, the spring-based fixture offered a simple and effective solution to hold pressure during experiments. • Stack pressure variation is significantly different among the fixtures tested. • Spring-based fixtures offer a robust solution to apply stack pressure. • Fixed displacement devices fail to mitigate cell relaxation effects. • Pneumatic devices are best explored with active pressure control.

Journal of Power SourcesVol. 629
Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Oxford Brookes University
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
2.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.