Structure and influence in the spread of collective violence

Contradicting 50 years of analysis of urban rioting in the U.S., I connect diffusion notions to structural and economic conditions to show that structural conditions are important in predicting riot occurrence-but in a different way than previously imagined. Using riot and census data from United States in the 1960s, this analysis shows that instead of being directly responsible for producing riots, poor structural conditions increase the chances that the residents of a city will imitate other riots. This distinction is subtle, but means that structural effects are moderated by the prior behavior of other actors: lack of prior rioting depresses effects of structural conditions but as riots accumulate, structural conditions begin to play a role and activate imitation. This suggests that structural conditions alone may not have been enough to invoke rioting, but they provided fertile ground for diffusing riot ideology as the riot wave progressed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Research
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103129
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structure and influence in the spread of collective violence

Daniel J. Myers
Social Science Research
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Structure and influence in the spread of collective violence

Daniel J. Myers
article en

Abstract

Contradicting 50 years of analysis of urban rioting in the U.S., I connect diffusion notions to structural and economic conditions to show that structural conditions are important in predicting riot occurrence-but in a different way than previously imagined. Using riot and census data from United States in the 1960s, this analysis shows that instead of being directly responsible for producing riots, poor structural conditions increase the chances that the residents of a city will imitate other riots. This distinction is subtle, but means that structural effects are moderated by the prior behavior of other actors: lack of prior rioting depresses effects of structural conditions but as riots accumulate, structural conditions begin to play a role and activate imitation. This suggests that structural conditions alone may not have been enough to invoke rioting, but they provided fertile ground for diffusing riot ideology as the riot wave progressed.

Social Science ResearchVol. 126
Misericordia University (US)
National Science Foundation
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.