Does water rights trading cause economic losses from agricultural water scarcity? Evidence from 264 Chinese cities

China’s rapid economy growth has intensified the pressure on water resources, with agriculture being the largest consumer. Insufficient water in agriculture can constrain production and lead to significant economic losses. Water rights trading (WRT) is a key mechanism for reallocating water resources within and across water-scarce regions and industries. However, WRT often reallocates saved agricultural water to more economically productive sectors. A crucial consideration is whether this shift could lead to agricultural water scarcity, thus affecting agricultural production. This study examines whether WRT contributes to potential economic losses in agriculture. Using panel data from 264 Chinese cities from 2010 to 2020, we estimate the Agricultural Water Scarcity Risk (AWSR), which quantifies the economic loss caused by agricultural water scarcity, and analyze the impact of WRT on AWSR using the Spatial Difference-in-Differences method. Our findings reveal that: (1) WRT significantly alleviate the economic production loss due to agricultural water scarcity, with the results remaining robust after various tests; (2) WRT mitigates AWSR not only locally but also in neighboring cities; and (3) the policy’s effectiveness varies by region, being most effective in the Eastern region, followed by the Central region, and least in the Western region. This study highlights the importance of rational water resource management in agriculture and provides a foundation for developing strategies to mitigate agricultural water scarcity risk in high AWSR regions. • Water rights trading does not cause agricultural water scarcity risk, but generates mitigating effects. • Assessing agricultural water scarcity risk at the city level provides a more precise depiction of water scarcity. • The spatial spillover mitigation effects of water rights trading are greater than the local. • Water rights trading's policy impact displays regional heterogeneity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109233
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does water rights trading cause economic losses from agricultural water scarcity? Evidence from 264 Chinese cities

Mei Qu, Qiang Li, Jiajia Liu, Jun Zhao et al.
7 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Water resources management and optimization
2.35
article

Does water rights trading cause economic losses from agricultural water scarcity? Evidence from 264 Chinese cities

Mei Qu, Qiang Li, Jiajia Liu, Jun Zhao, Muhammad Umer
article en
7 citations

Abstract

China’s rapid economy growth has intensified the pressure on water resources, with agriculture being the largest consumer. Insufficient water in agriculture can constrain production and lead to significant economic losses. Water rights trading (WRT) is a key mechanism for reallocating water resources within and across water-scarce regions and industries. However, WRT often reallocates saved agricultural water to more economically productive sectors. A crucial consideration is whether this shift could lead to agricultural water scarcity, thus affecting agricultural production. This study examines whether WRT contributes to potential economic losses in agriculture. Using panel data from 264 Chinese cities from 2010 to 2020, we estimate the Agricultural Water Scarcity Risk (AWSR), which quantifies the economic loss caused by agricultural water scarcity, and analyze the impact of WRT on AWSR using the Spatial Difference-in-Differences method. Our findings reveal that: (1) WRT significantly alleviate the economic production loss due to agricultural water scarcity, with the results remaining robust after various tests; (2) WRT mitigates AWSR not only locally but also in neighboring cities; and (3) the policy’s effectiveness varies by region, being most effective in the Eastern region, followed by the Central region, and least in the Western region. This study highlights the importance of rational water resource management in agriculture and provides a foundation for developing strategies to mitigate agricultural water scarcity risk in high AWSR regions. • Water rights trading does not cause agricultural water scarcity risk, but generates mitigating effects. • Assessing agricultural water scarcity risk at the city level provides a more precise depiction of water scarcity. • The spatial spillover mitigation effects of water rights trading are greater than the local. • Water rights trading's policy impact displays regional heterogeneity.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 307
China Geological Survey (CN), Geophysical Survey (RU), North West Agriculture and Forestry University (CN), Northwest A&F University (CN)
Northwest A and F University, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Clean water and sanitation, Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Water resources management and optimization
2.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.