Climate change impacts on two European crop rotations via an ensemble of models

Continuous long-term simulations of an ensemble of nine crop models covering the 1961–2080 period was employed to assess the expected impacts of climate change on the crop yield and water use for distinct crop rotations (CRs) in Europe. In this study, the likelihood of changes in two differently managed CRs (conventional and alternative) involving four important field crops (winter wheat, spring barley, silage maize, and winter oilseed rape) was assessed. The conventional agricultural practice (CR1) included only mineral fertilization with the removal of crop residues after harvest. The alternative agricultural practice (CR2) included cover crops and the application of mineral and organic fertilizers, with crop residues retained in the field. The simulations covered six sites in five European countries (Mühldorf and Müncheberg in Germany, Ukkel in Belgium, Ødum in Denmark, Milhostov in Slovakia and Lednice in Czechia) based on two distinct soil profiles (universal soil and site-specific soils). The universal soil was the same across all the sites, while the site-specific soils were typical of each region. Eight transient climate change scenarios (4 general circulation models (GCMs) under representative concentration pathways (RCPs) 2.6 and 8.5) were used to capture the possible evolution of future climatic conditions. Compared with those during the 1962–1990 period, the ensemble projections for the 2051–2080 period indicated average increases in the annual yields of all crops of 0.7 t/ha (RCP 2.6) and 0.8 t/ha (PCP 8.5) under both CRs and soil types. Under most climate change scenarios, the crop model ensemble projections of the winter wheat and winter oilseed rape yield increases agreed for CR2 but not for CR1. For spring barley, the simulated increase was more sporadic, with no significant difference between CR1 and CR2. In regard to silage maize, the changes in the simulated yields depended on site-specific climatic conditions. If the same varieties were planted in the future, yield reductions would be expected, except at the Ødum site, where the silage maize growth conditions would remain satisfactory, regardless of the CR and soil type. The results indicated greater cover crop biomass production, which could affect the long-term soil water balance and groundwater replenishment. The crop model ensemble further indicated a greater spatial variability in the yield can be expected, which is likely caused by the expected increase in the air temperature and not by the expected increase, or even decrease, in the total precipitation and increases in the actual evapotranspiration under climate change at all sites. This trend was greater under CR2 and could affect the long-term soil water balance and soil regime in the case of rainfed agriculture. • 9 models were applied for 2 rotations, 4 crops, 2 soils, 8 scenarios, 6 sites a continuous run over 120 years. • In the projected future, an increase in the annual yields of all crops included in the study can be expected. • The potential for yield increase in the projected future is higher within alternative agricultural practice. • A higher gradient in yield responses across Central Europe caused by the increase in air temperature can be expected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Agronomy
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2024.127456
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate change impacts on two European crop rotations via an ensemble of models

Alfredo Rodríguez, Reimund P. Rötter, Sabina Thaler, Milan Fischer et al.
2 citations
European Journal of Agronomy
Climate change impacts on agriculture
2.06
article

Climate change impacts on two European crop rotations via an ensemble of models

Alfredo Rodríguez, Reimund P. Rötter, Sabina Thaler, Milan Fischer, Jørgen Eivind Olesen, Claas Nendel, Josef Eitzinger, Luisa Leolini, Monika Bláhová, Roberto Ferrise, Martin Dubrovský, Jan Bálek, Jakub Bohuslav, Munir Hoffmann, Eva Pohanková, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Jozef Takáč, Kurt Christian Kersebaum, Juraj Balkovič, Marco Moriondo, Camilla Dibari, Margarita Ruiz‐Ramos, Petr Hlavinka, Vakhtang Shelia, Miroslav Trnka, Johannes Wilhelmus Maria Pullens, Rastislav Skalský
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Continuous long-term simulations of an ensemble of nine crop models covering the 1961–2080 period was employed to assess the expected impacts of climate change on the crop yield and water use for distinct crop rotations (CRs) in Europe. In this study, the likelihood of changes in two differently managed CRs (conventional and alternative) involving four important field crops (winter wheat, spring barley, silage maize, and winter oilseed rape) was assessed. The conventional agricultural practice (CR1) included only mineral fertilization with the removal of crop residues after harvest. The alternative agricultural practice (CR2) included cover crops and the application of mineral and organic fertilizers, with crop residues retained in the field. The simulations covered six sites in five European countries (Mühldorf and Müncheberg in Germany, Ukkel in Belgium, Ødum in Denmark, Milhostov in Slovakia and Lednice in Czechia) based on two distinct soil profiles (universal soil and site-specific soils). The universal soil was the same across all the sites, while the site-specific soils were typical of each region. Eight transient climate change scenarios (4 general circulation models (GCMs) under representative concentration pathways (RCPs) 2.6 and 8.5) were used to capture the possible evolution of future climatic conditions. Compared with those during the 1962–1990 period, the ensemble projections for the 2051–2080 period indicated average increases in the annual yields of all crops of 0.7 t/ha (RCP 2.6) and 0.8 t/ha (PCP 8.5) under both CRs and soil types. Under most climate change scenarios, the crop model ensemble projections of the winter wheat and winter oilseed rape yield increases agreed for CR2 but not for CR1. For spring barley, the simulated increase was more sporadic, with no significant difference between CR1 and CR2. In regard to silage maize, the changes in the simulated yields depended on site-specific climatic conditions. If the same varieties were planted in the future, yield reductions would be expected, except at the Ødum site, where the silage maize growth conditions would remain satisfactory, regardless of the CR and soil type. The results indicated greater cover crop biomass production, which could affect the long-term soil water balance and groundwater replenishment. The crop model ensemble further indicated a greater spatial variability in the yield can be expected, which is likely caused by the expected increase in the air temperature and not by the expected increase, or even decrease, in the total precipitation and increases in the actual evapotranspiration under climate change at all sites. This trend was greater under CR2 and could affect the long-term soil water balance and soil regime in the case of rainfed agriculture. • 9 models were applied for 2 rotations, 4 crops, 2 soils, 8 scenarios, 6 sites a continuous run over 120 years. • In the projected future, an increase in the annual yields of all crops included in the study can be expected. • The potential for yield increase in the projected future is higher within alternative agricultural practice. • A higher gradient in yield responses across Central Europe caused by the increase in air temperature can be expected.

European Journal of AgronomyVol. 164
Florida Museum of Natural History (US), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), Gregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology (AT), University of Potsdam (DE), Aarhus University (DK), Czech Academy of Sciences, Global Change Research Institute (CZ), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE), Výskumný Ústav Pôdoznalectva a Ochrany Pôdy (SK), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CZ), National Agricultural and Food Centre (SK), National Research Council (IT), University of Florence (IT), Mendel University in Brno (CZ), University of Göttingen (DE), University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.