Revisiting Ideology Measures in Political Surveys

The empirical evidence in this article demonstrates that responses to the regularly included questions in the American National Election Study asking respondents to place themselves on an Extremely Liberal to Extremely Conservative scale (LibCon) increasingly contain valid and useful information for a wide range of political analyses. Responses to this question in recent decades provide reliable summaries of respondents’ positions on a range of specific policy issues. These responses are now also strongly related to important political behaviors, such as turnout and vote. The evidence comes from a novel, more comprehensive and nuanced model of the full set of responses to the LibCon question. The results do not contradict earlier analyses of the LibCon responses that argued against using data on ideology but instead show that something has changed: A far broader set of the population can and does understand and use the questions’ ideological labels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/734259
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Ideology Measures in Political Surveys

John E. Jackson, Kenneth Kollman
The Journal of Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Revisiting Ideology Measures in Political Surveys

John E. Jackson, Kenneth Kollman
article en

Abstract

The empirical evidence in this article demonstrates that responses to the regularly included questions in the American National Election Study asking respondents to place themselves on an Extremely Liberal to Extremely Conservative scale (LibCon) increasingly contain valid and useful information for a wide range of political analyses. Responses to this question in recent decades provide reliable summaries of respondents’ positions on a range of specific policy issues. These responses are now also strongly related to important political behaviors, such as turnout and vote. The evidence comes from a novel, more comprehensive and nuanced model of the full set of responses to the LibCon question. The results do not contradict earlier analyses of the LibCon responses that argued against using data on ideology but instead show that something has changed: A far broader set of the population can and does understand and use the questions’ ideological labels.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 88(1)
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.