Real-time undifferenced precision time transfer of multi-GNSS and multi-frequency

Abstract Currently, the four major Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) are capable of supporting multi-frequency signals, and Real-time (RT) State Space Representation (SSR) correction products have been enriched and improved. Multi-GNSS, multi-frequency observations and multiple satellite RT SSR correction products present new opportunities to implement precise RT time transfer. This study extends the traditional post-processing dual-frequency undifferenced (UD) Precise Point Positioning (PPP) time transfer to RT multi-frequency scenarios, establishes models for dual-frequency, triple-frequency, quad-frequency and penta-frequency multi-GNSS PPP time transfer, and evaluates the product availability, orbit accuracy and clock offset accuracy of RT SSR products from BKG, CNE, DLR, ESA, GFZ, GMV, WHU, and IGS. A multi-frequency and multi-GNSS RT PPP time transfer experiment was conducted by selecting data from four stations, BRUX, PTBB, ONSA and SPT0, with precise atomic clocks mounted for one week. The accuracy of various SSR products in RT PPP time transfer was compared, and the performance of BDS/Galileo combination dual-frequency to penta-frequency RT UD PPP time transfer was evaluated. The experimental results show that the standard deviation and frequency stability difference of RT PPP time transfer among each SSR product is relatively small, especially after combining multi-systems. The frequency stability tends to be entirely consistent. In general, the WHU, GFZ, GMV, and WHU SSR products offer notable advantages in terms of accuracy and frequency stability for GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and BDS RT PPP time transfer, respectively. Multi-GNSS and multi-frequency signals have both enhanced RT PPP time transfer performance, with a particularly noticeable improvement in terms of accuracy and short-term frequency stability. The effect of multi-GNSS on RT PPP time transfer is more pronounced than that of multi-frequency alone. Considering the higher costs associated with multi-frequency GNSS receivers, prioritizing multi-GNSS for RT PPP time transfer is recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Science and Technology
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ad9e28
Citations
4
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-time undifferenced precision time transfer of multi-GNSS and multi-frequency

Jing Tao, Wei Xu, Jia Tao Song, D. Qiu et al.
4 citations
Measurement Science and Technology
GNSS positioning and interference
5.20
article

Real-time undifferenced precision time transfer of multi-GNSS and multi-frequency

Jing Tao, Wei Xu, Jia Tao Song, D. Qiu, Peng-fei Zhang, Chao Yan, Jian Chen, Lewen Zhao, Liang Lei
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Currently, the four major Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) are capable of supporting multi-frequency signals, and Real-time (RT) State Space Representation (SSR) correction products have been enriched and improved. Multi-GNSS, multi-frequency observations and multiple satellite RT SSR correction products present new opportunities to implement precise RT time transfer. This study extends the traditional post-processing dual-frequency undifferenced (UD) Precise Point Positioning (PPP) time transfer to RT multi-frequency scenarios, establishes models for dual-frequency, triple-frequency, quad-frequency and penta-frequency multi-GNSS PPP time transfer, and evaluates the product availability, orbit accuracy and clock offset accuracy of RT SSR products from BKG, CNE, DLR, ESA, GFZ, GMV, WHU, and IGS. A multi-frequency and multi-GNSS RT PPP time transfer experiment was conducted by selecting data from four stations, BRUX, PTBB, ONSA and SPT0, with precise atomic clocks mounted for one week. The accuracy of various SSR products in RT PPP time transfer was compared, and the performance of BDS/Galileo combination dual-frequency to penta-frequency RT UD PPP time transfer was evaluated. The experimental results show that the standard deviation and frequency stability difference of RT PPP time transfer among each SSR product is relatively small, especially after combining multi-systems. The frequency stability tends to be entirely consistent. In general, the WHU, GFZ, GMV, and WHU SSR products offer notable advantages in terms of accuracy and frequency stability for GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and BDS RT PPP time transfer, respectively. Multi-GNSS and multi-frequency signals have both enhanced RT PPP time transfer performance, with a particularly noticeable improvement in terms of accuracy and short-term frequency stability. The effect of multi-GNSS on RT PPP time transfer is more pronounced than that of multi-frequency alone. Considering the higher costs associated with multi-frequency GNSS receivers, prioritizing multi-GNSS for RT PPP time transfer is recommended.

Measurement Science and TechnologyVol. 36(2)
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), Anhui University of Science and Technology (CN), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Southeast University (BD), Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (CN), Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping (CN), Chuzhou University (CN), Southeast University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
GNSS positioning and interference
5.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.