Warfare, Fiscal Gridlock, and State Formation During Europe’s Military Revolution

We introduce a political scope condition for the classic argument that war motivates expansions in the state’s fiscal capacity. All major medieval European monarchies separated the power to tax from the power to spend. We argue that this fiscal separation of powers engendered gridlock, which became increasingly intolerable after 1500 due to the military revolution and the greater role of money in battlefield victory. European states thus reformed toward one of two stable equilibria – fiscal absolutism or parliamentarism. Elsewhere in Eurasia, states were already fiscally absolutist, and thus war pressures did not provoke similar reform efforts. Exploiting new panel data on 101 European territorial units, we document how external war pressures promoted reforms in a majority of units toward fiscal absolutism (which took a distinctive decentralized form), with a minority of units adopting fiscal parliamentarism (either centralized or decentralized), and peripheral units retaining fiscal separations of power (and hence gridlock).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/734269
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Warfare, Fiscal Gridlock, and State Formation During Europe’s Military Revolution

Mark Dincecco, Gary W. Cox, Massimiliano Gaetano Onorato
2 citations
The Journal of Politics
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
2.26
article

Warfare, Fiscal Gridlock, and State Formation During Europe’s Military Revolution

Mark Dincecco, Gary W. Cox, Massimiliano Gaetano Onorato
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We introduce a political scope condition for the classic argument that war motivates expansions in the state’s fiscal capacity. All major medieval European monarchies separated the power to tax from the power to spend. We argue that this fiscal separation of powers engendered gridlock, which became increasingly intolerable after 1500 due to the military revolution and the greater role of money in battlefield victory. European states thus reformed toward one of two stable equilibria – fiscal absolutism or parliamentarism. Elsewhere in Eurasia, states were already fiscally absolutist, and thus war pressures did not provoke similar reform efforts. Exploiting new panel data on 101 European territorial units, we document how external war pressures promoted reforms in a majority of units toward fiscal absolutism (which took a distinctive decentralized form), with a minority of units adopting fiscal parliamentarism (either centralized or decentralized), and peripheral units retaining fiscal separations of power (and hence gridlock).

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 87(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.