Discrepancies in dating the expansion of European glaciers during the Last Glacial Cycle

One of the most important problems in glacial geomorphology is the disagreement regarding the dates of glacial advances. During the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, ~29 to 19 ka), the generalised advance of mountain glaciers coincided with the greatest extent of ice in the large ice sheets of northern Europe and North America and with the lowest sea level during the Last Glacial Cycle (∼110 to 11.7 ka). The significant number of studies dealing with glacial chronologies during recent decades and improvements in dating techniques have provided a wide range of information about the evolution of European glaciers and the timing of major glacial advances that deposited different types of moraines, proglacial sediment (especially fluvioglacial and kame terraces, and sandar ), and glaciolacustrine sediment. Several publications have synthesized data on the evolution of European glaciers as a starting point for analysis of synchronous or asynchronous patterns regarding the dates of glacial advances in European ice sheets and mountain glaciers. Thus, studies of the significant glacial advances during MIS 5, MIS 4, and MIS 3 have reported disparate dates, so available information only provides an incomplete understanding of the expansion of European glaciers. Some of these discrepancies were significant, such as the occurrence of advances at the end of MIS 3 in some mountains of southern Europe while the ice sheet occupied a very small area in the Scandinavian Peninsula. Other dating discrepancies, such as events during the LGM and the Oldest Dryas (Heinrich Stadial 1), are smaller but still relevant. The possible causes of these discrepancies include climatic differences between northern and southern Europe, the importance of local topographic factors, and the variety of dating techniques. This review does not include the Younger Dryas Stadial, because the short duration of this cold period does not reflect the occurrence of large disparities in the timing of glacier advances, and also because of the uncertainty ranges of the datings overlap with the onset of the Holocene and the end of the Bølling-Allerød. • Glacial advances in the European glaciers show remarkable dating discrepancies. • A high number of glacial advances occurred during MIS 3 and MIS 4. • Some mountains recorded the maximum glacier extent during the LGC at the end of MIS 4. • Remarkable dating discrepancies have been recorded during LGM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geomorphology
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109566
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discrepancies in dating the expansion of European glaciers during the Last Glacial Cycle

Juan Ignacio López‐Moreno, José M. García‐Ruiz
4 citations
Geomorphology
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
1.51
article

Discrepancies in dating the expansion of European glaciers during the Last Glacial Cycle

Juan Ignacio López‐Moreno, José M. García‐Ruiz
article en
4 citations

Abstract

One of the most important problems in glacial geomorphology is the disagreement regarding the dates of glacial advances. During the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, ~29 to 19 ka), the generalised advance of mountain glaciers coincided with the greatest extent of ice in the large ice sheets of northern Europe and North America and with the lowest sea level during the Last Glacial Cycle (∼110 to 11.7 ka). The significant number of studies dealing with glacial chronologies during recent decades and improvements in dating techniques have provided a wide range of information about the evolution of European glaciers and the timing of major glacial advances that deposited different types of moraines, proglacial sediment (especially fluvioglacial and kame terraces, and sandar ), and glaciolacustrine sediment. Several publications have synthesized data on the evolution of European glaciers as a starting point for analysis of synchronous or asynchronous patterns regarding the dates of glacial advances in European ice sheets and mountain glaciers. Thus, studies of the significant glacial advances during MIS 5, MIS 4, and MIS 3 have reported disparate dates, so available information only provides an incomplete understanding of the expansion of European glaciers. Some of these discrepancies were significant, such as the occurrence of advances at the end of MIS 3 in some mountains of southern Europe while the ice sheet occupied a very small area in the Scandinavian Peninsula. Other dating discrepancies, such as events during the LGM and the Oldest Dryas (Heinrich Stadial 1), are smaller but still relevant. The possible causes of these discrepancies include climatic differences between northern and southern Europe, the importance of local topographic factors, and the variety of dating techniques. This review does not include the Younger Dryas Stadial, because the short duration of this cold period does not reflect the occurrence of large disparities in the timing of glacier advances, and also because of the uncertainty ranges of the datings overlap with the onset of the Holocene and the end of the Bølling-Allerød. • Glacial advances in the European glaciers show remarkable dating discrepancies. • A high number of glacial advances occurred during MIS 3 and MIS 4. • Some mountains recorded the maximum glacier extent during the LGC at the end of MIS 4. • Remarkable dating discrepancies have been recorded during LGM.

GeomorphologyVol. 471
Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (ES)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
1.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.