Taking Variance Seriously: Visualizing the Statistical and Substantive Significance of ARCH-GARCH Models

Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH) and generalized ARCH (GARCH) models allow users to estimate the conditional mean and conditional error variance of a time series process. Although simulation methods exist to disaggregate the short- and long-run effects of covariate shocks to the conditional mean, scholars’ inferences about the conditional error variance are currently limited to tabular interpretation. We propose a novel method of interpretation that moves beyond these tabular inferences. First, we show how changes in ARCH-GARCH processes are conditional on starting values, other covariates, and dynamics, which has led to incomplete or even incorrect inferences. We then develop three bootstrapping techniques to simulate conditional error variance model results and showcase the usefulness of each through replication of prominent studies. Our techniques demonstrate the crucial role of simulation and prediction for drawing statistical and substantive inferences about the volatility of dynamic time series processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/734275
Primary Topic
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taking Variance Seriously: Visualizing the Statistical and Substantive Significance of ARCH-GARCH Models

Allyson Lucinda Benton, Soren Jordan, Andrew Philips
The Journal of Politics
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
article

Taking Variance Seriously: Visualizing the Statistical and Substantive Significance of ARCH-GARCH Models

Allyson Lucinda Benton, Soren Jordan, Andrew Philips
article en

Abstract

Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH) and generalized ARCH (GARCH) models allow users to estimate the conditional mean and conditional error variance of a time series process. Although simulation methods exist to disaggregate the short- and long-run effects of covariate shocks to the conditional mean, scholars’ inferences about the conditional error variance are currently limited to tabular interpretation. We propose a novel method of interpretation that moves beyond these tabular inferences. First, we show how changes in ARCH-GARCH processes are conditional on starting values, other covariates, and dynamics, which has led to incomplete or even incorrect inferences. We then develop three bootstrapping techniques to simulate conditional error variance model results and showcase the usefulness of each through replication of prominent studies. Our techniques demonstrate the crucial role of simulation and prediction for drawing statistical and substantive inferences about the volatility of dynamic time series processes.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 88(1)
University of Essex (GB), University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Colorado System (US), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Taking Variance Seriously: Visualizing the Statistical and Substantive Significance of ARCH-GARCH Models — Allyson Lucinda Benton, Soren Jordan, et al. · The Journal of Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS