Bi-level optimal scheduling of integrated energy systems considering incentive-based demand response and green certificate-carbon trading mechanisms

To address climate change and adapt to the shift in energy systems toward greater intelligence and diversity, integrated energy systems (IES) have emerged as a key approach to improve energy utilization and promote sustainable growth. However, the incorporation of IES adds complexity in harmonizing different mechanisms, complicating the simultaneous consideration of carbon emissions and operational expenses. Accordingly, this study introduces a bi-level optimal scheduling approach for IES that addresses current scheduling limitations, balances supply and demand, and includes carbon emissions management, with the integration of incentive-driven demand response (DR) and green certificate-carbon trading mechanisms. Firstly, a DR model utilizing time-of-use power pricing and dynamic carbon emission variables is established, directing consumers to adopt low-carbon behaviors through the transmission of carbon signals. Secondly, the interaction mechanism between green certificate trading (GCT) and carbon emission trading (CET) is examined, facilitating the coordinated operation of carbon quotas and pricing variables while preventing the double counting of carbon reduction attributes. Thirdly, a bi-level low-carbon economic optimization model has been built. The upper-level strategy aims to reduce supply-side costs related to CET and GCT, whereas the lower-level strategy seeks to optimize energy consumption and carbon emission costs on the demand side, thereby achieving coordinated optimization of carbon emissions and economic costs across both supply and demand sides. Finally, findings from the case study reveal that implementing green certificate-carbon trading along with incentive-based demand response effectively lowers operational costs and carbon emissions by 23.14 % and 16.38 %, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Reports
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.12.016
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bi-level optimal scheduling of integrated energy systems considering incentive-based demand response and green certificate-carbon trading mechanisms

Zhiwei Li, Siyuan Shui, Hao Wu, Haipeng Chen et al.
14 citations
Energy Reports
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
2.92
article

Bi-level optimal scheduling of integrated energy systems considering incentive-based demand response and green certificate-carbon trading mechanisms

Zhiwei Li, Siyuan Shui, Hao Wu, Haipeng Chen, Haolin Li, Chen Fang
article en
14 citations

Abstract

To address climate change and adapt to the shift in energy systems toward greater intelligence and diversity, integrated energy systems (IES) have emerged as a key approach to improve energy utilization and promote sustainable growth. However, the incorporation of IES adds complexity in harmonizing different mechanisms, complicating the simultaneous consideration of carbon emissions and operational expenses. Accordingly, this study introduces a bi-level optimal scheduling approach for IES that addresses current scheduling limitations, balances supply and demand, and includes carbon emissions management, with the integration of incentive-driven demand response (DR) and green certificate-carbon trading mechanisms. Firstly, a DR model utilizing time-of-use power pricing and dynamic carbon emission variables is established, directing consumers to adopt low-carbon behaviors through the transmission of carbon signals. Secondly, the interaction mechanism between green certificate trading (GCT) and carbon emission trading (CET) is examined, facilitating the coordinated operation of carbon quotas and pricing variables while preventing the double counting of carbon reduction attributes. Thirdly, a bi-level low-carbon economic optimization model has been built. The upper-level strategy aims to reduce supply-side costs related to CET and GCT, whereas the lower-level strategy seeks to optimize energy consumption and carbon emission costs on the demand side, thereby achieving coordinated optimization of carbon emissions and economic costs across both supply and demand sides. Finally, findings from the case study reveal that implementing green certificate-carbon trading along with incentive-based demand response effectively lowers operational costs and carbon emissions by 23.14 % and 16.38 %, respectively.

Energy ReportsVol. 13
Electric Power University (VN), State Grid Corporation of China (China) (CN), Northeast Electric Power University (CN), Tebian Electric Apparatus (China) (CN), Shanghai Electric (China) (CN), Jilin Electric Power Research Institute (China) (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
2.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.