LiDAR-based scaling of OpenSim musculoskeletal human models is a viable alternative to marker-based approaches — A preliminary study

Biomechanical analysis is increasingly being undertaken in field-based settings, often using inertial sensors or video-based pose estimation. These advancements necessitate more practical and accessible scaling methods as alternatives to traditional laboratory-based techniques like optical marker-based scaling. LiDAR scanning is a technique that could provide a reliable and efficient means of scaling biomechanical models. This study tested a scaling method for OpenSim models and comparing outcomes with those of traditional marker-based scaling in healthy adult participants. An anatomical skeleton was inferred from a LiDAR scan taken with an iPad. Key skeletal landmarks were then used to generate scaling factors using statistical shape models. The scaling factors of the pelvis, femur and tibia body segments derived from the LiDAR-based method demonstrated excellent reliability, with repeated scans of seven subjects producing an ICC value of 0.961. When comparing the scaling factors of eight additional subjects with the current gold standard technique of marker-based optical motion capture, a Bland-Altman analysis revealed differences of -0.5% ± 5.3 (95CI = [-10.8, 10]). Joint kinematics calculated using LiDAR scaled models had an average RMSD of 3.7° ± 0.1°when compared with those calculated with a marker-scaled model. These results indicate that a LiDAR-based scaling method can address the challenge of accurate and reliable scaling methods that are practical for use in the field. Future work with larger cohorts and diverse populations, and scaling of other body segments will provide further validation and enhance the generalizability and robustness of this approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomechanics
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112439
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LiDAR-based scaling of OpenSim musculoskeletal human models is a viable alternative to marker-based approaches — A preliminary study

Dominic Thewlis, Clint R. Bellenger, Grace McConnochie, A. J. Fox
6 citations
Journal of Biomechanics
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
1.11
article

LiDAR-based scaling of OpenSim musculoskeletal human models is a viable alternative to marker-based approaches — A preliminary study

Dominic Thewlis, Clint R. Bellenger, Grace McConnochie, A. J. Fox
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Biomechanical analysis is increasingly being undertaken in field-based settings, often using inertial sensors or video-based pose estimation. These advancements necessitate more practical and accessible scaling methods as alternatives to traditional laboratory-based techniques like optical marker-based scaling. LiDAR scanning is a technique that could provide a reliable and efficient means of scaling biomechanical models. This study tested a scaling method for OpenSim models and comparing outcomes with those of traditional marker-based scaling in healthy adult participants. An anatomical skeleton was inferred from a LiDAR scan taken with an iPad. Key skeletal landmarks were then used to generate scaling factors using statistical shape models. The scaling factors of the pelvis, femur and tibia body segments derived from the LiDAR-based method demonstrated excellent reliability, with repeated scans of seven subjects producing an ICC value of 0.961. When comparing the scaling factors of eight additional subjects with the current gold standard technique of marker-based optical motion capture, a Bland-Altman analysis revealed differences of -0.5% ± 5.3 (95CI = [-10.8, 10]). Joint kinematics calculated using LiDAR scaled models had an average RMSD of 3.7° ± 0.1°when compared with those calculated with a marker-scaled model. These results indicate that a LiDAR-based scaling method can address the challenge of accurate and reliable scaling methods that are practical for use in the field. Future work with larger cohorts and diverse populations, and scaling of other body segments will provide further validation and enhance the generalizability and robustness of this approach.

Journal of BiomechanicsVol. 179
Deakin University (AU), University of South Australia (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.